"CEO Said A Thing!" Journalism

"CEO said a thing!" journalism involves parroting the claims of a business leader or executive with absolutely no context, correction, or challenge whatsoever, no matter how elaborate the delusion.

The Fine Print*

@peter

Even if had not included the phrase "a club of brunchlords and trust fund nepobabies", which it does...

Yeah, as sharp as hell

@peter is it Karl on the fediverse?
@peter Agree on that. CEOs are often treated as experts in the field, even though they are not. Why writing about what Altman thinks about AI and not asking an AI scientist? Why asking Musk about brain interfaces and not somebody who works in this field? Not only do CEOs often lack deeper knowledge, they also have clear financial interests. They very likely won't say the truth, but only what benefits them. It's like writing an article and citing an tv advertisement clip as source
@kaidu @peter I prefer asking an expert in a closely related field, close eniugh for a decent judgement but far enough to not need funding for the thing they are commenting on.

@peter ooh, good reading, I’m going to be on the lookout for “CEO Said A Thing” pieces in the outlets I follow.

Similar vibe: https://www.404media.co/elon-musk-tweeted-a-thing/

Elon Musk Tweeted a Thing

Dozens of human journalists are writing the same blog to appease a search algorithm that wants to automate their jobs out of existence.

404 Media

@jerbear
This calls for a bot that everytime Musk tweets anything it will post “Musk has tweeted something probably untrue”.

(Substitute “untrue” with “racist”, “eugenicist”, “stupid”, etc. at random.)

@peter

@peter kin to “a president said a thing” which thing we already know is false.
@peter this bit “It's a sort of journalistic Ken Doll with the genitals sanded off to a smooth hump to avoid offending anyone” is absolutely spot on.

@peter OMG yes. I ban outlets that do that.
"Elon Musk says"
"Sergey Brin opines"
"Jensen Huang claims"
"Sam Altman thinks"
"Mark Zuckerberg believes"

With the benefit of hindsight, these brainwaves are laughably inaccurate and fairly indurable.

And pretty much zero of these articles has much of any intellectual value.

It's the clickbait of the 2025+ era.

@peter
Parroting CEOs insults my intelligence; reflexively I veer away.

Quoting that sharp article,
"good reporting is certainly peppered in the morass"

Yeah, let's grow a list of those peppers ! --
a) Heather Richardson
b) Peace Talks radio
c) meditationsinanemergency.com
d) https://the.ink/p/stop-despairing-start-building?publication_id=70374&post_id=192080345&isFreemail=false&r=9dxl9&triedRedirect=true

#massmedia
...

Stop despairing. Start building

My conversation with Rebecca Solnit

The.Ink

@peter Sharp as hell.

Adding this to my hopper. :)

@peter the last paragraph is great and sad and so telling:

I'd end with some noble call for the U.S. media industry to do better, but it's abundantly clear they don't want to.

@peter The unit of authoritarianism is submission, willfull submission and obedience.
@peter once you see it, you cannot unsee
@peter edge case: president said a thing. Same concept, worse effect.
@peter It definitely is the standard now...
@peter we need to use a hashtag for this crap on articles! #CEOSaidAThing

@peter It's not really anything new. When I worked for 3com we won a magazine award for a product that didn't yet exist. When I was involved in lobbying the trick was to give most journalists a paste together article. When you wanted your embedded dev tool to take off you supplied it with free course materials to lots of lecturers (esp in India). Companies had pet journos.

The difference is we also used to have some journalists with values and a voice, now we have almost none.

@peter

bloody hell what a good phrase

@peter
Person with a scandalous level of entitlement: says something entitled and out of touch.
Journalist: spreads it uncritically.