So public transport users have supported the system by paying for it, now it will be free for motorists? Why? Because they will be suffering?

It’s cool that there is extra capacity available, but why isn’t it being used to reduce the current overcrowding on peak services?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-29/free-public-transport-april-victoria-fuel-prices-cost-of-living/106506974

Public transport to be free for Victorians in April as fuel prices climb

The Victorian government says public transport will be free across the state in April in a bid to relieve cost-of-living pressure as fuel prices continue to climb.

It’s amusing that Labor politicians have this privileged way of thinking.

“The schmucks who use it every day can eat a bag of dicks, but those unaccustomed to public transport will require a softer cushion to ease their pain.”

@kentparkstreet1 I agree. It's an ass faced reaction by government.
Instead of making public transport more available and reliable for the majority over the decades, they pander to the regular petrol users. Cos yeah, life is tough when you have to decide between food on your table or food for your SUV (I exaggerate 😉).

@Stevie63

Increasing capacity and improving safety so everyone can use the system and save money would be a more honest approach. This feels like PR.

@Stevie63 @kentparkstreet1 Honestly, I'm not surprised.

On Wednesday, I literally told a colleague at work that if I were a state government political strategist, I'd be urging the premier to make public transport free.

On the broader topic...

For 20 or 30 years, there's been a group of talking heads who have consistently argued against ending our fossil fuel dependence. That includes oil and gas.

Who have deliberately spread disinformation about the climate. Who have forcefully argued for more roads, and against public transport. Who have argued against replacing gas appliances with electric. Who have argued against renewables and storage. Who have argued for petrol engines over battery electric. Who got the price on carbon repealed.

Remember all those times we were told about how more oil and gas would make things cheaper?

The Scott Morrison gas-led recovery.

And here we are. Diesel is over $3 a litre and these same arseholes are crying about fuel prices and cost of living?!

Spare me!

@aj @Stevie63

And when fares return to normal after petrol prices decrease it will be the punters paying off the cost.

@kentparkstreet1 and just like pausing mutual obligation during covid, when this fuel crisis us over, we'll go back to charging for "public" transport.

If there's one thing all #australia can come together on, it's that "beating poor people with sticks" is the national sport. We bloody love that shit. Better still if they're disabled and/or brown.

Asked my work for an Opal (aka Myki, Oyster etc) card instead of a Fuel Card. Their response? Laughter and incomprehension. Why would I, a rich able-bodied white person, want to beat MYSELF with STICKS? Madness, it's #UnAustralian .

@Heterokromia

We could double unemployment benefit when nice middle class people needed it.

I get that from a Tory government. I guess we have Tory Labor government now.

@kentparkstreet1 To me, this looks like one of those things that the government should be doing all along. Doing it now shows they _can_ do it. So, why wait for a severe situation? And, why flag it as only temporary? They know they can make it the norm.

Earlier in the COVID pandemic, we saw a bunch of other "emergency" measures that were temporary, and have mostly been wound-back, but could and should be permanent, such as:
- Work from home no questions asked, and no forced days in the office.
- Staying out of the office or public gatherings if you're sick and going to make other people sick.
- Government payments to unemployed people doubled, so people out of work had a more livable income near the poverty-line instead of drowning in debt and being forced to go without essentials.

To get back to free public transport being permanent — it would have beneficial improvements to quality of life, such as:
- Cutting air-pollution from vehicle emissions.
- Reducing road noise in residential areas.
- Sparing drivers/cyclists/pedestrians from injuries/deaths from motor vehicle crashes.
- Shashing the political power of the motoring lobby.
- Educating people about it's bizarre that we "need" to waste so much usable land on carparks.
- Improvements to non-car transport infrastructure such as buses, trains, and cycling lanes.
- Fixing the social snobbery and political divide that puts a wedge between public transport commuters and car commuters.

@BinChicken

This all requires long term planning. Right now trams in the city are banked up, they can’t run more. Trains could be run more often, but not until all the level crossings are gone.

We’d also have to rewrite public/private contracts.

I agree, all this can be done, but it’s probably a five year project.

@kentparkstreet1 It’s an opportunity to get more people using transit. It will lower pollution, mean less congestion. I hope they adapt train schedules to accommodate increased traffic, as a bad experience will have folk racing back to their cars.

@CStamp

I doubt they have the capacity to increase services. If they do, why are our current peak services so crowded?

I don’t see the reason for making it free? Why not try to expand services to cater to an increase of use due to petrol prices? Why do people need more incentive?

@kentparkstreet1 People need incentive to change habits.

If they cannot increase capacity, then that is a very stupid, badly-planned solution that is going to frustrate everyone.

@CStamp @kentparkstreet1

Capacity is much harder to organise than changing a ticket price. Victorian government has been addressing several constraints on capacity over the past decade, including an entirely new train line.

I do think there's plenty of incentive from fuel prices without having to give away free fares, but it's also a good publicity stunt that makes the govt look like they're doing something.

The price of second hand cars has dropped near 10% in recent weeks, so people are ready to look at alternatives. If we get a bunch of new PT fans then maybe it's a net win. Would be even better if the free PT was a permanent initiative like it is in the CBD.

@ewen @kentparkstreet1 If you are used to the convenience of a car, with your own music, your own schedule, quieter, no crowds shoving and lining up, no mass exposure to covid and flu viruses, then the extra push of "try this, it's free for a while" might have more folk give it a try. A car in traffic is still more comfortable than a crowded public transit car.

Doing this without first considering impact on service and planning for it, though, is ill-advised.

@CStamp @ewen

The idea of this is cost reduction due to petrol prices. Why do we need to encourage anyone? Offering more services to cater to more passengers makes sense, but why should we give incentives to do something for their own benefit?

@kentparkstreet1 @ewen Less traffic will benefit everyone who breathes, less air pollution.

@CStamp @ewen

I just can’t see that all the people who’ve used the system for years had to pay, but those who chose not to have to be bribed to use it short term, until petrol comes down again. Without extra capacity no one will be converted to using it all the time.

@kentparkstreet1 @ewen It seems it will be free to everyone?

So consider this a reward.

@CStamp @ewen

Our public transport is privately operated. We’ll have to pay those corporations.

@ewen @CStamp

I reckon we’ll get many furious that their tram is banked up on St Kilda Rd, or their train is too full to be able to get in.