Calico JesseAdvanced Dungeons and Dragons was the first RPG Heartbreaker.
Fight me.
Digital Mark λ ☕️ 🕹 👽@deinol As I understand the Forge people, they meant it as a slander against games that were too complex to learn in one session or required "math" (anything more than 1-digit addition), and wouldn't make a lot of money or displace D&D.
But AD&D made a stupendous amount of money, funnelled all of it to Gary instead of Dave until the lawsuit, displaced Basic D&D by about 25-50% until they pretty much killed Basic for AD&D 2E. Remained too hard for Forgeites to learn.
#ttrpg #dnd
E.T.Smith@mdhughes @deinol That's rather a fundamental misunderstanding of the original intent behind the term. It wasn't the math, it was the misdirected creativity that made the original FHBs as tragic as they were compelling. Go read the original essay: https://www.indie-rpgs.com/articles/9/
@E_T_Smith @deinol
> It fascinates me how far some of these go, especially in combination with the bizarre math necessary to derive the secondary attributes. <
I played semi-regularly with several Forgeites in Seattle, math-phobia was *endemic* among them. Hand-holding them thru even middle-complexity systems was like teaching kindergarten.
"Part Four: Business and marketing" is exactly what I said: The idea these wouldn't compete! Well, many did, they're still here & thriving.
#ttrpg #dnd
I must admit it had been a long time since I looked at the article, so it distilled into my head as “passionate project with good ideas but a disorganized mess and also some mediocre ideas“.
@deinol “passionate project with good ideas but a disorganized mess and also some mediocre ideas.“
Many FHBs weren't bad from a design perspective, some were even comparable to professional games. I feel the main flaw Edwards was trying highlight in the essay was one of marketing -- independent designers who didn't know any other model of publication but AD&D, so that's what they emulated (at great expense) ... which was a ludicrous thing to do at a time when AD&D was dominant.
@deinol Admittedly, FHBs as Edwards presented them were the result of pre-internet circumstances that faded out some time ago (cheap digital publishing and the dawn of the OGL in particular being the major sea changes). So the venacular meaning of "Fantasy Heartbreaker" has degraded in actual use over the years -- I've heard kids using it to broadly mean "something that's like D&D, but isn't," including Shadowdark and Pathfinder.
mhd@E_T_Smith @deinol I never quite got that part of the essay. He said that you couldn't sell house ruled D&Ds in the 90s. Sure. But that sounds like you could in any previous age. What was true of Hahlmabrea or Darkurthe was also true of What Price Glory or High Fantasy in the 70s (Arduin was probably as good as it got). And heck, I'd argue that it didn't change in the age he was writing in, either.
Even if his other point would be used, focusing on a fictional "One Neat Thing" and thus turning the heartbreaker into a TRVE KVLT Forge game. Which IMHO is quite bonkers anyways, as that's clearly not what the heartbreaker authors would want. It's like telling a post punk band to get rid of the guitars because that sounds like all the other post punk bands and focus instead on that short MiniMoog sting shortly before the chorus.
I wish we would find a better word for "D&D-ish game", but right now "FHB" has some usefulness. (Personally I consider removing it from this origin a feature, not a bug, but that's at least partially spite-based)