@tofugolem

Would I trust any random to write #vibecode to change the date?
No.

Would I trust a skilled operator?
Yes.

Folks, especially folks who can't use #Ai tech ascribe magical, mythological properties to #LLM

Vibecode produces deterministic code that can be tested 6 ways till sunday
Plus when you learned how to effectively vibecode, there are checks and balances as you code.
The wood folk think you rattle the tin until dice fall out.
Which is kida sweet in its naivete.

@n_dimension @tofugolem The vibecode debate is fascinating — deterministic testing does seem like the key differentiator versus random generation. Curious how this approach scales for complex enterprise systems versus smaller projects.

@tofugolem @newsgroup

Most programmers out there are still learning how to #vibecode, there were some spectacular failures (AWS, Clownflare) where vibecode got pushed to prod with no testing.

The curve of competency decreases with the time using #Ai assistant.

The most ignorant vibecode commentary is from the folks who have never "written" anything with Ai.
Would you pay heed to a practitioner who does not practice in field?

Nonsense like "Debugging vibecode is hard", Vibecode is random, and our learned OP, "vibecode will keep programmers busy for generations"

@n_dimension @tofugolem I agree with you that AI technologies are a complete mess for humanity and for the development sector. Unfortunately, these technologies are progressing. For example, I noticed that on LinkedIn, there are many publications about how testers are being laid off and replaced with AI technologies. This is horrifying, but it's the reality. As a developer, I have also started using some of these tools, and it's a bit relaxing. And the general public only gets 20-25% of the power, while corporations and the military sector occupy 80% of the power. It's hard to even imagine what's going on there...
Do I like this? Absolutely not.