Google's profound contempt for journalists is on display as it rewrites publications' headlines in search results, sometimes altering the meaning and intent of the original. https://www.theverge.com/tech/896490/google-replace-news-headlines-in-search-canary-coal-mine-experiment

The company calls it an "experiment" -- as if that makes it OK.

Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines

Google is beginning to replace news headlines in its search results with ones that are AI-generated. After AI clickbait nonsense in its Google Discover news feed, it’s starting to mess with headlines in the “10 blue links” too.

The Verge
@dangillmor well journalists have shown how far backwards they can bend over for crypto, trump, and AI. I don't think they will fight back.
@dangillmor Yes. An experiment in how many people they can get to stop using goo gull.

@dangillmor Amazing they haven't modified the world population to fit the amount of unique "hits" they receive.

"There's 50 trillion humans. We know 'cause analytics show us."

@dangillmor headline writers have already demonstrated maximum contempt for journalists.

I won’t mind if Google can provide a more accurate summary than the click- and rage-bait headlines that publications favor these days.

@jlargentaye I'm sorry to say you're right about that.
@jlargentaye @dangillmor
point is not to defend clickbait or rage-bait. but alphabet inc may put those baits into extreme with a.i. generated garbage.
@jlargentaye @dangillmor Yeah, I was going to make a very similar comment. 🫤

@Andres4NY @jlargentaye @dangillmor

There's no call to suppose Google has any reason to make headlines _less_ rage-baity.

@jlargentaye @dangillmor I saw a headline here today that read "Albo REFUSES to rule out $4 / L petrol".

What Australian politician would make *any* promises about fuel pricing right now?

It's just so obviously rage- / click-bait trash.

Agreed that it's ethically wrong for Google to re-write headlines they're linking to, but not necessarily because they'd be *worse*.

@dangillmor everyone moaning about copilot going to have the shock of their life that unlike their niche, masses are already flying with Captain Gemini..
@dangillmor
It is simple.
Life is much better without Google.
@dangillmor I don’t recall the last time I used Google, but I’m sure it’s been 7–8 years, probably since I discovered DuckDuckGo. At first it was frustrating, much like the switch to Linux, but I don’t miss it. I would simply like to be able to use an Android device without Google, because even the iPhone doesn’t align with my way of life.
@dangillmor In the past, before Google came along, you had to use multiple search engines to find information. Now DuckDuckGo is excellent, in fact, it’s far better than Google.

@dangillmor

With regards to:

The company calls it an "experiment" -- as if that makes it OK.How long was gMail technically in "beta"? Felt like it was forever, even beyond when it exited the invite-only phase.

@dangillmor Tampering with headlines is not the experiment. Google could do that internally. Seeing how much of the public will accept tampered headlines — that's the experiment.
@dangillmor I both like and dislike this tbh.
I find a lot of headlines to be quite misleading on purpose, especially in tech news. I think at least half the time I wouldn't mind an AI summary headline instead.
My problem is I think both should be shown, and tagged appropriately.
Article: "Mission complete success!"
AI: "President makes claims he can't back up about mission."