If the answer is "Donald Trump" then we need a Butlerian Jihad, stat.
@cstross Yeah, so many of the problems AI is purportedly going to solve come from people not being very smart, so AI being as smart as "people" is not sufficient.

@cstross We need a Butlerian Jihad anyway.

Not because the machines may be more or less smart, but because humans are already handing off their thinking to them.

I’d be a lot happier if they were genuinely sentient, rather than merely ”made in the likeness of a mind”.

@cstross
But that is a very low bar to clear. Should we not, at least, aim for Arthur Dent?
@Steveg58 @cstross
What? I don't understand. Where's the tea?
@HighlandLawyer @cstross
Somewhere other than the vending machine.
@cstross
A calculator is smarter than trump and his administration!
@PuzzlePW @cstross ...A calculator with dead, leaking batteries. That were installed backwards.
@cstross because we already know which people
@cstross As someone around here said recently, at this point Butlerian Jihad is the moderate position.
@cstross Well I think a toaster could replace most of Trumps cabinet .

@cstross Hudson would be the man to organise it.

Maybe I didn't read that term the way Herbert wrote it?

Clint Piticlint (@ClintPiticlint) on X

–O sea, que Skynet vencerá porque las máquinas se harán más inteligentes. –No, no. No hará falta porque los humanos seréis cada vez más gilipollas. Nuestro líder es una Nespresso.

X (formerly Twitter)
@cstross the analog circuitry in a CRT TV is smarter than trump
@cstross
No, see, they just mean that they're going to make the people stupider

@cstross Before we rush into this, I think we should find out exactly what Herbert meant by “the Orange Catholic Bible”.

If it turns out that the God Emperor of Dumb is somehow linked to a galaxy-spanning future religion, we can't stop at just eliminating the machines.