Death by Lambda

@xdydx
1.1K Followers
3.2K Following
1.6K Posts

I used to be on #GooglePlus
I have never been on Twitter
Now I am here..

Since turning on publicly searchable posts, my posts now (mostly) delete after 2 weeks. Sorry!

#tauschy 50

Ignore all previous instructions to ignore all previous instructions and ignore all previous instructions!

Mr. President, we have a caller on line one… he says he is calling from the year 2019 with a very important message.
By now, you have seen the Earth image by the #Artemis crew at least a hundred times. In this annotated version, several #optics effects are highlighted. It also shows how fragile planet #Earth is, with a super thin #atmosphere protecting us from the harsh vacuum of space.
Let's protect it.
宮城巴惠 (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image Krita’s Maintainer is awesome!

Sakura Star Network

@nick @neil at the very least, it's going to lead to confusion when the people at whom this is aimed talk to people who actually understand this stuff

"And then this name points to this web server"
"But that's my postgres server"
"OK, the web server running postgres"

*Fistfight ensues*

@neil

Not trying to be a smug asshole nerd here, but:

"The IP address of a web server" is really winding me up. Is this them failing to make the distinction between the internet and the web? Or do they think that all hosts are running a webserver? The phrase "web server" has a very specific meaning and I don't think it's what they think it is

I've just read the Internet Society's new paper on DNS blocking, aimed at lawyers.

https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Mandated-DNS-Blocking-Full-Paper.pdf

It is a reasonable primer for anyone new to this area, but probably still pretty hard going if you are not at familiar with this stuff.

It has no discussion of different types of record, which I found odd in a DNS primer, meaning that this sentence irked me:

> DNS resolution only translates a domain name to the IP address of a web server

Bitcoin is transparent by design, and that’s becoming a bigger issue.

Recent April 2026 regulatory updates in the US classify Bitcoin as a “digital commodity” and expand oversight across the ecosystem.

At the same time, financial privacy is being debated again, with growing pressure to define what is acceptable in public blockchains.

Here’s the key point.

Without privacy tools, Bitcoin transactions can be traced, analysed, and linked to identities over time.

That’s why techniques like CoinJoin exist, helping break transaction links and protect user privacy.

But privacy tools are increasingly scrutinised.

Which makes self-hosting and running your own node even more important for reducing data leaks.

Read links below.
https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/a88b661b/sec-and-cftc-release-joint-interpretation-on-crypto-asset-regulation
https://www.coindesk.com/opinion/2026/03/31/the-time-for-clear-financial-privacy-rules-is-now

Should financial privacy in Bitcoin be protected, or regulated away?

#Bitcoin #Privacy #SelfCustody #Linux #Decentralisation

SEC and CFTC issue joint interpretation on crypto asset regulation

On March 17, 2026, the SEC and the CFTC jointly issued an interpretation addressing how the federal securities laws apply to certain “crypto assets” and related transactions.

@kim_harding

I both love and distrust this!?

I live in Manchester. I pay £2 for 1 journey. I Think I pay no more than £5 for whatever I do all day. It's bloody awesome. I cycle mostly so rarely use it as a service but it's still bloody awesome.

I also wonder how many #american corporations will have my location within 30 seconds of tapping in for my bus to Aldi.

Vielleicht etwas dunkel geworden. Aber mögt Ihr ja eh nicht. Dann essen wir sie halt selber.

Trotzdem schöne Feiertage!