@Schafstelze @wolf480pl @jmaris
«They can't afford to waste patriots for shaheds.»
🇺🇸 💀 No wonder they can't, the Patriots has not ever been «on sale» at the DumpShop! 🐓
@Schafstelze @jmaris
no I also mean in the Persian Gulf
USA does not even have enough patriots missile in stockpile to shoot one shahed with one patriot missile.
And it still needs to keep most of those missiles for a potential war with China.
And a patriot battery usually fires at least two missiles in parallel at any single target.
If money was the problem, USA could be shooting down shaheds with patriots and win. But the problem is production rate.
@Schafstelze @jmaris
Iran fired 1000+ shaheds in the first 3 days of the war, and ~400 ballistic missiles.
I'm guessing most of these patriots were used against ballistic missiles.
Still, that's an insanely high number of patriots and I'm worried about US's stockpile now...
@jmaris Yup!
Video proof:
https://mstdn.social/@stux/116272749029373219
The USA never learned anything from Vietnam.
"A spear. A goddam spear."

@nazokiyoubinbou i'm pretty sure both air defense and shooting down an enemy helicopter while repelling an invasion are both legal.
What is not legal is the way the US started the war with Iran
@jmaris You guessed wrong which one I meant.
The attack the US made is quite illegal by multiple definitions including our own laws.
Ukraine defending itself against an illegal invader is legal by any definition.
@wesdym The arms market has to be a very false one. It is a major part of the attraction of wars.
Vast monies to made in supplying devices to kill people.