The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.

Sam Bent
@davidgerard brb going to build the torment nexus for a laugh

@davidgerard

You saw the crypto footer? strange times

@davidgerard Someone should submit a PR to add race, religion and political party as totally optional systemd user profile fields.
@mathew @davidgerard 1930s IBM would like to extend an offer for hiring

@schrotthaufen @mathew @davidgerard

Or the Ministerium für Staatssicherheit

@mathew @davidgerard and annual income … since I reckon a lot of white christian republicans would be fine with those three
@mathew @davidgerard This is easily the best of the seemingly thousands of critical posts I've seen on the matter.
@davidgerard As a spectator using linux I am really scared that things work this way. Will we be reaching the point where one has to store and maintain and "gate keep" one's own personal linux version or kernel to stop this rot? Does #nixos if pinned keep the old #systemd pre this nonsense? What else is happening we should be aware of?

@adingbatponder «Does #nixos if pinned keep the old #systemd pre this nonsense?» I would think so (unless –of course– if you let some mechanism auto-update the pins), but would that be a good idea? It'd mean to also miss out on updates with security fixes.

So I guess it'd be better to let the corresponding nixpkgs package definition patch this feature out, or, if some in the community want it for whatever reason, introduce a compile-time option for it.

@davidgerard

@adingbatponder @davidgerard this is basically the whole point of open source software. If a component becomes undesirable the community can work together to cut it out. It's not gatekeeping, it's gardening; routine maintenance.

That said, adding a field to the userdb alone probably doesn't justify that kind of response. Someone using the new field to implement age gating though...

@natecox @davidgerard Sure. Of course. But the article was an amazing eye opener as to how these things happen and seems to be a warning that one should have one's eyes peeled....

@adingbatponder @davidgerard IMO the scary part is that it is seemingly considered acceptable to write an article like that, cosplaying as the FBI with that fake dossier showing the person's photo and legal name. and publish where they work and everything, just because you disagree with their views.

this article is clearly meant to intimidate them and anyone that might agree with them. if that's how we operate, what the fuck are we even doing? i thought FOSS was about collaboration and user freedom, not trying to threaten opponents for going against your idea of that freedom or whatever. i don't know that guy's circumstances, but doxxing campaigns could well end up being a much greater assault on freedom in the community than what they're trying to stop.

@notafish @davidgerard Oops. Fair point. I see the problem. It should have been anonymised. The information about who the actors are and possible motivations is of course interesting. I agree with your concern.
@notafish @adingbatponder @davidgerard "If you mention someone who has his name and contact info out on the open, to the point that they use that exact info when PRing those fascistic changes, you're doxxing them" is such a stupid take.
@LupertEverett @notafish @davidgerard I am not sure what the formal definitions are. I think one should just not hype and it might theoretically be that the person in question wants to undo it. Using real names online is so brave that it should be supported by polite calm feedback and not a hue and cry with lynching.
@davidgerard do you find doxxing open source contributors an acceptable way to engage in an argument?
@[email protected] doxxing fascists is time honoured for its effectiveness

@davidgerard

Beating Fascists to death with the nearest blunt instrument is also a time-honored tradition… really makes you think…

@davidgerard If this is your post can you not make the names fake / anonymous and just leave their background info? Has same information value? Just an idea. See post below