You may already ignore the google AI summary and have no faith in „relevance“ ordering.

But now the individual items may no longer describe results of a search, but what google thinks you want to see.

And you maybe in this experiment, you maybe not. Maybe you are in it next week.

https://www.theverge.com/tech/896490/google-replace-news-headlines-in-search-canary-coal-mine-experiment

Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines

Google is beginning to replace news headlines in its search results with ones that are AI-generated. After AI clickbait nonsense in its Google Discover news feed, it’s starting to mess with headlines in the “10 blue links” too.

The Verge
@icing Tbh, for new site discoverabiliy I feel like mainstream #searchengine are out of the question now, when #google #monopoly is more keen to use #ai scraper bot in stead of indexing one to generate summaries. I cant remember last time when I saw new interestung website without niche search engine, or just by someones recomendation. But for news discoverability... I feel like websites should have their own search engine that could be hooked to something like #searxng, or some search #database dump #format should emerge to lessen the burden on sites by caching search querries, and to allow simple sites without any sort of serverside logic to also be searchable. Though that still would have its own issues...