@grimalkina I see a lot of very small not-for-profit organisations covering travel/costs and ensuring speakers get at least an honorarium payment. So if they can do it, so can the large corporates.
I work in professional services in a uni and the way we effectively piss and moan and obstruct to avoid paying for stuff appals me. We're always angling for freebies or trying to get free this or that from small people/orgs, but we'll pay the big people/orgs loadsa cash...
@grimalkina I remember being asked to speak at a pay-to-attend event on disability and they didn't want to pay my travel even when I explained I'd lost my paid-job for disablism reasons so I was unfunded.
It took a lot of pushing back to get them to give me £50 to pay for my trainfare and busfare and I stayed with a friend nearby...
Their tickets weren't expensive but could have been £10 more (or higher for corp rate) each and covered all speaker's costs properly too. Those are CHOICES.
@Shadedlady Yep and pretty much what I told them. I said being a deafness focused conference, ostensibly wanting to foreground deaf voices, they should be paying for people's travel and costs even if not paying for their time.
It was by professionals for professionals. It really showed. Shame cos it was a great event and most attenders could have paid a bit more via workplaces to attend and covered costs properly!
@grimalkina travel expenses is a minimum! Most of us are/were not even charging speaker's fees.
I get that running a conference is expensive, but so are quality speakers.
Not fair for people starting, you can't expect people to run sessions "for visibility" or "exposure".
@grimalkina Yeah. I did conference talks and tutorial sessions back in the day. They were all open source conferences so somewhat low-budget and it was OK for sessions I *volunteered* for to be paid by comping entrance. (I suspect for
For sessions where the con *asked* me to give the talk, or special talks like tutorials? The assumption was always "I am generating revenue for you, you're paying travel and hotel and entrance".
@grimalkina I never did talks at regular cons so I can't say what I would've done, but these days I absolutely wouldn't go talk at one of those without compensation, even if I were already going.
There also used to be a feeling of "you're doing it as marketing for your consulting job!" which... yeah, that worked for low budget cons but those days are *long* gone -- if they're asking you to dance on stage they're asking for work, and work should be properly paid for.
@wordshaper The state of capitalism we are in right now will have the conference charge both the attendees and the speakers while getting the venue for free. That is a business in 2026.
Doing things so that everyone benefits is socialism and we all know the (wildly wrong) opinions on that. @grimalkina
@grimalkina Or a certification. I've only been to RSA once, but the only interesting talks were restricted to people registered to get CISSP continuing education credits.
Or Black Hat in general.
@grimalkina Whenever a conference asks me to cover my own costs, I ask them two simple questions:
Do you pay the caterers who serve lunch during the conference ?
Do you think people attend the conference for the food or for the content presented on the stage ?
Edit for clarity: this is a criticism of conference organizers, and most certainly not directed at Cat or her choices.
And yet over the past year I've "attended" three conferences without leaving my desk, featuring several presenters who also did not leave their desks.
I would be turning such invitations down on the basis of carbon emissions alone. Yes I know the in-person experience is superior, but I'm not willing to sacrifice future generations for that.
@grimalkina 🙏🏽
When my children were young, we ate thanks to the modest royalties from a few books like JavaScript Allongé. I spoke at and MC'd many conferences. I certainly wouldn't have gone anywhere without conferences paying for my travel and accommodation.
Thank you for advocating for this basic decency: A conference speaker should not be a corporate shill. A quality conference ensures this basic independence by funding its content, and that is the just path forward.
@grimalkina That’s very not cool.
Back when I was organizing a regular meetup, we didn’t have the funds to pay a speaker honorarium but we always covered travel, accommodation, and food. I can’t imagine asking someone to prepare a talk, take days for travel, and *also* have to pay their own way!
@grimalkina, I have written a ton about the trend towards not paying or even reimbursing conference presenters. Fifteen years ago, it was normal for me to be paid my workshop fee plus expense reimbursement. These days, it's a rarity.
Here's my latest post on the topic: "Compensating presenters and 'women’s work'".
https://www.conferencesthatwork.com/index.php/event-professionals/2026/01/compensating-presenters/
@[email protected] @[email protected] +1 If Chaos Communication Congress with it's at-cost pricing can help speakers whenever needed then conferences charging 3-4 digits can book some double doom and plane tickets... https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/116263379310052948
There is a heck of lot of climbing people pulling up the ladder behind them in tech, yes.
@grimalkina @inthehands I’d love for you to share your work in a keynote presentation at a PHP programming language conference. Conferences in the PHP community are among the few (among programming language conferences) who still cover speaker travel, hotel, and conference ticket. (There are no stipends or per diems, but lunch is provided, and there’s usually some kind of food in the evenings.)
I’d be happy to make some introductions, if you're interested.
@grimalkina @ramsey @inthehands If it's the International PHP Conference I can highly recommend it. Not only because I have talks there from time to time. It's my "home conference" (since I think 2000), I will have a talk this year too (about working with people in times of change). It's a very welcoming community.
And I also can highly recommend Cat. She's the leading researcher in her field (which you probably know
) and I've seen her speak and she's a great person. We met shortly at a LeadDev conference.
If it's about another PHP conference I can't recommend it because I've never been to another one 
@grimalkina you are right, and moreover it's not just who is heard that becomes constrained but also which topics. If someone can only speak if their employer covers travel and lodging, then the only topics that can be submitted are ones that serve the company's sales and PR agenda. Conferences are tedious when they are just a series of marketing talks. Nobody wants to attend that. They'll still buy an a ticket, on company credit card, but then treat the trip as an all expenses paid vacation to the host city because engineers are notoriously unwilling to sit through 8 hours of being marketed to.
The whole industry suffers from that loss of knowledge exchange. Travel funding is a diversity issue. But diversity is, as always, valuable because every damn person in the industry benefits from robust exchange of ideas.
@grimalkina my favorite conference talks are always the people who have independently done or researched or created something awesome and want to share it with the world. My second favorite conference talks are the people who get r&d roles at bigger companies and similarly want to talk about the interesting discoveries & creations. My least favorite conference talks are the thinly veiled sales pitches.
Sadly, most conferences prioritize speaker gigs in the inverse order. It's getting paid first and diversity second.
Their failure to pay your travel fees says more about them than it does about you.
A conference that isn't willing to truly pay somebody like you to show up, is just going to get yet another AI bro to fill a spot. And if they're happy with that, I don't know what we can do to change that 🤷🏻♂️