Zack Polanski (Green Party of England & Wales) argues that GDP should be downgraded as a measure of political economic success; he is 'much more interested in growing people’s mental health, growing our public services, growing cohesion of our communities'....

While possibly a quixotic aim given the continuing centrality of GDP measure to political discourse, it *does* play to people's distrust of GDP as a plausible measure of their own economic experience(s).

#economics #politics
h/t FT

@ChrisMayLA6
Whenever the topic of GDP comes up, I'm reminded of Robert F. Kennedy's dismantling of GDP as a metric in 1968 with the summation of his speech: "it measures everything in short, except that which makes life worthwhile." increasingly economic activity appears to have a somewhat tenuous relationship with the well-being of society as a whole,many of whose members have seen incomes stagnate while rent seeking entities take an ever larger portion of that already stretched income.

@tompearce49

yes, I used to have that quote on a powerpoint slide early on in my lecture on how to measure economic activity....

@ChrisMayLA6 @tompearce49
Julian Huppert (ex MP for Cambridge) used to point out that demolishing and rebuilding hospitals would massively increase GDP whilst improving absolutely nothing for anybody.

@KimSJ @tompearce49

Although in Keynesian terms not really completely true - the multiplier effect of the money spent first on demolition & then the following funds spent on rebuilding would all flow outwards into the economy - hence Keynes notion that counter-cyclic economic policy might be just dig big holes & fill them in, provided it was paid employees doing it - the multiplier produces economic effects beyond the actual practical action beef paid for....

@ChrisMayLA6 @tompearce49
True, of course, though I wonder what the negative effects of not having the hospital available for maybe a decade would be. No employment for doctors and nurses, worse health outcomes locally, etc. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
In fact you could also increase GDP by demolishing and *not* rebuilding hospitals. πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
Conclusion: we definitely need to include the value of national infrastructure in whatever measure replaces GDP, just as all businesses account for the value of their assets.

@KimSJ @tompearce49

Indeed; the activity itself is not neutral in effect (as you rightly point out), but the multiplier does mean to some extent the cost(s) are nitrated more widely, but yes the valuing if infrastructure is key, which (to be fair to Rachel Reeves) is what the new version of the fiscal rules is approaching as a logic