I’m catching up on the news today and see that Nvidia forecasts $1T in GPU sales over the next 18 months. That is crazy. I don’t know how that works at any level.

Also on the nvidia news front, they are making a version of the gpu for orbital datacenters. Now I’ve been around for a long, long time and I’ve heard some pretty dumb ideas in that time, and I feel like orbital datacenters is at least in the top 10.

@jerry

I am now terrified to ask what the top 10 list you do have is.

Nothing about the casino economy has any contact with reality. And when we take into consideration that a handful of billionaires own about 80% of all stocks, it’s just an inside game of their manipulating stock prices.

@GhostOnTheHalfShell
Is that true, that ā€œ a handful of billionaires own about 80% of all stocks, it’s just an inside game of their manipulating stock pricesā€? šŸ¤”
Terrifying!
#USPol #InsiderTrading #corruption #briberyAndCorruption #NoConsequences

@jerry

@Su_G @jerry

The top 10% own 94% of all stock.

ā€œ …found that the lion’s share of these gains went to the richest 1 percent. This elite group owns 54 percent of public equity markets, up from 40 percent in 2002. The next 9 percent (or households in the 90th to 99th percentile) saw their share of public market value grow from 38 percent in 2002 to 39 percent, a modest gain.ā€

https://inequality.org/article/stock-ownership-concentration/

The Richest 1 Percent Now Own a Greater Share of the Stock Market Than Ever Before

Baby bonds are one effective strategy for addressing the fact that only 1 percent of stock market wealth is owned by the bottom half of households.

Inequality.org
@GhostOnTheHalfShell @Su_G @jerry seriously?! That explains so much. Where did I put that guillotine?

@lizzard @Su_G @jerry

I haven’t pinned it down, exactly what the roughly the starting income level for the 90% is, but I think it’s 250,000 a year.

The wealth disparity is very real.

@GhostOnTheHalfShell @Su_G @jerry it's not about income. It's never about income. It's always about what you already own and how much money that generates.

I'm from Germany, and a German book called "Crazy rich" has opened my eyes towards this fact and how "our" rich people behave. Can't really recommend as it's a great book, but ruins your mood.

The stock market thing though - I genuinely thought it was more diverse.

@lizzard @Su_G @jerry

That’s slightly depends on the definition you meaning of income. There’s salary and wages and that kind of compensation and then there’s interest income.

But to your point, the very richest people derive all their income from their assets.

Yet there’s one more perversity here. Very rich people don’t spend their assets. They use them as collateral for loans. Financial engineering allows them to minimize their tax liability. Complicated but that’s the gist of it.

@GhostOnTheHalfShell @Su_G @jerry yeah, I was thinking salary/wages. My language's "Einkommen" means exactly that, and it's easy to translate it as income and forget the subtle difference between the two languages.

I've realized what you describe only recently. Knowing that makes some lobby messages (especially re: inheritance tax) even more perverse: "you can't tax that! imagine what inheritance tax would do to family companies!" (The actual families hurt by inheritance tax would be exactly the kind of people who've never in their lives had to depend on salary or wages and couldn't transfer that to their offspring anymore.)

@lizzard @Su_G @jerry

There is another aspect to inheritance tax. It is necessary to make resources, especially land, think farming, available to people who want to engage in farming or other business. The second generation doesn’t have a good track record running their inherited businesses. More often than not, the offspring see the company as a cash cow.

Consolidation of farmland, for instance, has just caused prices to go up preventing new entrants. This is why farmers are aging out.

@GhostOnTheHalfShell @Su_G @jerry wealth accumulates. And we have way too much of that, in America and in Europe. If this accumulation isn't kept in check, then... Well there's not much besides revolution or war that can redistribute things then, is there? (Boy have I become radicalized in recent years...)

@lizzard @Su_G @jerry

Anyone exposed to any significant span of history end up thinking the same way you and I do.

@GhostOnTheHalfShell
Hey thanks for that, I guess… what a depressing read (along with the rest of this thread). Gives new significance to the question I’m now seeing asked: who benefits from the elevated oil prices that are a consequence of the war in Iran. ā˜¹ļø

@jerry

@Su_G @jerry

Of course it’s depressing read. The only difference between you and me is I’ve known about this for a couple of years now. So if you see me flaming out over flattening morbid wealth and smashing corporations down to size, you know where it’s coming from

@GhostOnTheHalfShell
I found this para an interesting summary… albeit usual depressing ending
(the rest of the article is about American billionaires’ ā€œgiving pledgesā€ - now out of fashion, apparently):
ā€œWealth last concentrated at such levels during the original Gilded Age, the 1890s through the early 1900s, and the correction didn’t come from philanthropists. It came from trust-busting, the federal income tax, the estate tax, and eventually the New Deal. It arrived as policy that was driven by political pressure too powerful to be ignored. The institutions that forced that correction — a functional Congress, a free press, an empowered regulatory state — look considerably different today.ā€
https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/15/the-billionaires-made-a-promise-now-some-want-out/

#wealthConcentration #GildedAge #correction #taxes #institutions #USPol
#reconnectingconsequencesToCauses

@jerry

The billionaires made a promise -- now some want out | TechCrunch

In 2010, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates launched a disarmingly simple campaign they called the Giving Pledge: a public commitment, open to the world's

TechCrunch