While Trump is holding rallies claiming that wind turbines do not work, I am looking at the realtime view of Danish power generation…
Total electricity consumption: 5817 MW
Total electricity production from wind: 6436 MW
While Trump is holding rallies claiming that wind turbines do not work, I am looking at the realtime view of Danish power generation…
Total electricity consumption: 5817 MW
Total electricity production from wind: 6436 MW
Texas, despite having abundant offshore wind, has most of its wind farms on land, and they supply a lot of electricity. There are also numerous wind farms all across the American high plains.
Offshore wind has a lot to offer and is an important technology, but it's not the only game in town.
@mirano @randahl you can have wind turbines in land locked countries. Usually, the towers needed to be a little taller to evade ground turbulence. However, this is easily available from any wind turbine company.
Best way to do it when local community profit from the taxes and even better when local communities, the people can invest directly.
So does his butt!
Renewable energy is also significantly less expensive.
Imagine an economy that doesn't have to subsidize the fossil fuel industry.
https://e360.yale.edu/digest/republican-spending-bill-fossil-fuel-subsidies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel_subsidies
Imagine geopolitics freed of fossil fuel fascism & 19th century thinking.
https://www.iisd.org/articles/deep-dive/route-energy-security-scrap-fossil-fuel-subsidies
Imagine national budgets liberated from the bloodsucking leaching
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jul/21/revealed-oil-sectors-staggering-profits-last-50-years
Imagine a shift in priorities away from oil
https://cleantechnica.com/2025/06/18/big-oil-has-a-plan-waste-as-much-energy-as-possible/
The "analysts" they used for this are almost assuredly over estimating actual cost (at $100B)
If you look at countries who are already doing this.. China, Denmark, etc.
Costs don't stay flat over time... they decrease as more of your infra switches over (to renewables)
- that's "even if" you do it "the dumbest possible way" (1-to1 replacements)
If they do Micro-grids it's cheaper, more reliable, +easier to transition
@randahl yes. And our jackass right politicians are current running an election campaign on building nuclear plants...
As one of my colleagues said today: "let's remove the red tape, and set a single condition for building a nuclear plant; you must have a deposit over to the state covering any and all expenses of a cleanup once a fuck up occurs before you get permission to build it"
There. Now no one can afford it, and the public won't have to foot the bill.
@randahl
...And my electric bill in the far-suburbs of Chicago has gone up around 30% since the nearby data centers went online. (Yes, that was plural.)
No new power supply
+ an entire huge city of households usage added to the grid
= MY utility prices go up.
Thankfully, our new Mayor is putting a moratorium on new #DataCenters .
#ElectricGrid #Utilities #PowerCosts #UtilityBills #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #GreenEnergy #Windfarms #Solar #WindEnergy
#FamilyFarms are some of the biggest benefactors from #GreenEnergy . In the USA, farmers can get paid thousands of dollars for each wind turbine on their land. This is a reliable source of income in an industry that gambles heavily on the weather and market prices.
https://cleanenergy.org/news/wind-power-pays-222-million-a-year-to-rural-landowners/
@randahl #WindFarms #SolarFarms #ElectricGrid #PowerGeneration #PowerSupply #PowerGrid #Farming #FamilyFarms #PowerSources
@randahl we also have this:
Wind generated more than 85TWh - nearly 30% - of Great Britain's electricity last year, up slightly on 2024, according to analysis of Neso data.
"But oil works when the sun's not shining and the wind doesn't blow!"
Yeah, and the sun shines and the wind blows when you're starting trillion dollar wars in the oil chokepoints, genius...
@randahl This is an interesting live map of electricity production:
https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/DK-DK1/live/fifteen_minutes
@randahl for those who hadn't caught on:
Trump lies.
All the time.
Is 600 MW exported?
Great. I hope that batteries soon provide another use for surplus.
Batteries let solar energy power us 24/7.
People once proudly shared their transister radio playing music anywhere. Imagine. Eight transistors, powerful technology.
Transistors now? Processors now measure in the tens of billions of transistors. 8 to 30,000,000,000
Battery costs are roughly falling 90% every 11 years.
1st image is battery cost decline of 90% to 2010 to 2022, 2nd is a different 11 year 90% decline of lithium battery cost decline 2013 to 2024.
It's still a cost, though. If I run my dishwasher at noon, I pay nothing, thanks to my panels. If I run it in the evening, I need to buy a battery first. The principle can be extrapolated to entire countries.
Yes, we'll need batteries. But intelligent load shifting (e.g. with price incentives) is better because it reduces the number of batteries needed.
Of course. States should be creating the economic stability of batteries on scale.
But my "ignore power outages" LED bulbs show batteries are cheap, growing ludicrously more cheap, and are being added faster than google provides surveillance hooks into the internet.
For batteries think water tower. Once the water tower goes up water and water pressure is ubiquitous and simple.
Battery, found everywhere, cheap and smartly connected so no outage is a system outage.
My ceiling and lamp LED light bulbs that detect power outages and run on -their own- batteries until power is back (windy locale, private power (sigh))
Solar energy fed ubiquitous batteries.
Solar atop every roof. Battery Ubiquity.
It will be amazing, as they are leading him off in handcuffs in an orange suit he will *still* be spouting complete falsehoods.