technomancy
Spindley Q Frog@technomancy There's also "Horse64 Root", the systems programming-flavoured horse64 variant? This might rule actually
@SpindleyQ Rewrite It In Horse!!!
slotek@technomancy Kittygram’s fake Claude instructions are priceless. 😅
@_slotek_ love it!
alys@technomancy has there been any comments either way from Clojure core team that you're aware of?
@technomancy i know Rich alluded to it in his last keynote but that felt more like a "i don't know about all this" rather than anything definite.
@alys I literally just asked them today in slack lol
Alex says they have no policy; I'm requesting clarification as to whether this is "we need more time to think it thru" or "we don't think this is important enough to address" but it seems likely it's the latter
the contributor agreement has always included verbiage which strongly implies LLM code would not qualify (it must be an original work of your authorship) but I doubt LLM fans will actually read that or care