@matdevdug Good article, lots to agree with.
A little feedback / question, if I may? The image near the bottom of the article... it has no alt text, and while I recognise it as Marienborg, it's not labelled as such; and in any case, I have no idea why you've included Marienborg in the article. Perhaps a joke or metaphor that I'm just not getting. 🤷🏻♀️
Finally, the image caption ("Imagine this...") seems to be styled exactly the same as the main paragraph text, so it just looks like the first line of the next paragraph.
Marienborg and caption-styling aside, I have nothing to criticise in the article. Well written, sir :-)
@matdevdug @jimkennedy I couldn't easily find it in the docs, which is why I searched the web for it.
@Mastodon Is the author tag feature described on docs.joinmastodon.org, or didn't get it any documentation after the initial announcement on the blog?
I think it should go here: https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/profile/#fields and/or here: https://joinmastodon.org/gd/verification
The title is "Boy i was wrong about the Fediverse" but i cant find what the wrong thinking was within the blog text...@matdevdug
I honestly was having similar thoughts just this morning. When it all feels hopeless and overwhelming, there is the Fediverse.
Just as you said - people are posting about what they know. There is SO much value in that. Thanks for reminding me why I keep showing up here. 🙏
@matdevdug "...Actual human beings were able to find each other and ask direct questions without this giant mountain of bullshit engagement piled on top of it. Meta or Oracle or whoever owns TikTok this week couldn't stop me. .."
Yes. #fediverse
Read your post. #Trump and the #FCC are trying to censor the news, but we're not at Pyongyang Times levels of media freedom. #WaPo editorials are awful now, but #NYT and local news is great.
Also... "To thrive in #capitalism one must be amoral. Now you can be wildly sickeningly successful with morals but you cannot reach that absolute zenith of shareholder value." IMO those sentences contradict each-other pretty directly. Being wildly successful isn't "thriving"?