RE: https://mastodon.social/@JulianOliver/116184681305474579
Take this into account into your risk analysis, people. If you're an activist or journalist investigating the power that be you have a different risk profile.
RE: https://mastodon.social/@JulianOliver/116184681305474579
Take this into account into your risk analysis, people. If you're an activist or journalist investigating the power that be you have a different risk profile.
@Mdubbelm I don't have a clear answer. It depends on your risk profile. Who might be interested in your (communication) data?
If your reasons for choosing Proton are to protect yourself from morally impaired cyber criminals, Proton might still be a good solution. If you want to protect yourself from a state-like entity you have a problem & need more help than Proton with it's generic services probably can offer. Now this does not mean that one should continue to use Gmail either....
@BjornW good point. We must be careful, however, to prevent FUD in these matters (not saying you do, btw! ;-)): what was passed was _payment_ data, not 'e-mails' of I understood correctly.
Moving to a different provider would not have prevented this unless it does not comply with law or payments were cash (which Proton allows also)?