Das digitale Briefgeheimnis lebt! Tausend Dank an alle, die Druck gemacht haben! ❤️🙏
Finale Schlacht folgt: Plenarabstimmung! 🚀🔥
🇮🇹🎉🔥 VITTORIA DI TAPPA: La LIBE respinge oggi la proroga del #ChatControl 1.0 indiscriminato – nessuna maggioranza! 🛡️💪
Il segreto della corrispondenza digitale è salvo! Mille grazie a tutti coloro che hanno fatto pressione! ❤️🙏
Battaglia finale: Voto in plenaria!🚀🔥
@echo_pbreyer 🇳🇱🎉🔥 HISTORISCHE OVERWINNING!
LIBE-commissie heeft zojuist de verlenging van #ChatControl 1.0 zonder gerechtelijk bevel VERWORPEN – geen meerderheid! 🛡️💪
Het digitale briefgeheim is gered!
Ontzettend bedankt aan iedereen die zijn stem heeft laten horen! ❤️🙏
Volgende ronde: stemming in de plenaire vergadering! 🚀
#StopScanningMe
Yeaaaaahhhhhhh!
Good. Step by step we can do it.
Thanks to be focused Patrick.
@Kurosetii @echo_pbreyer chat control 2.0 was mandatory scanning, that has been dead in the water since the danish presidency removed it from their regulation after public pressure
this was their backup plan, it failed too. what will they try now 👀
@iguana09863 @Kurosetii @echo_pbreyer yeah, that's what they already tried when they changed it from "service providers have to scan messages" to "service providers have to take all appropiate measures to detect CSAM, which may include scanning". for every time we push back against Chat Control the subsequent attempts become less and less legitimate in the eyes of the general public and lawmakers/parliament
i wonder if they'll come out with the sniffing dog excuse again and pretend they can detect content in encrypted communications without breaking the encryption. don't say it too loud or you'll give them ideas 
@echo_pbreyer 🇪🇸🎉🔥 ¡VICTORIA HISTÓRICA!
La comisión LIBE acaba de RECHAZAR la extensión del #ChatControl indiscriminado, ¡no hay mayoría! 🛡️💪
¡El derecho a la privacidad de la correspondencia digital ha sido salvado!
Un millón de gracias a todos los que habéis levantado vuestra voz ❤️🙏
La batalla final: ¡votación en sesión plenaria! 🚀
@echo_pbreyer thanks for the info!
Do you know if they rejected it because they think extending CC1 is bad for privacy or if they rejected it because CC1 doesn't do enough surveillance?
Danke für das unermüdliche Aufmerksammachen und Mobilisieren!
