🚄✈️ Why is it still so hard to choose a train over a plane?

On many long-distance routes in Europe, choosing the train can feel like a borderline heroic decision. It’s often more expensive, takes longer, and can be less reliable when connections are tight.

This week we spoke to cross-border rail advocate @jon about what Europe would need to change to make rail the obvious choice, not a moral gesture.

Here’s his recipe. THREAD:

#trains #travel #europe #infrastructure

1. Better, more interconnected timetables.

One early morning train from Berlin to Paris is not a serious offer on a continent of this size. Sparse frequencies and poorly aligned connections make cross-border travel stressful. If you cannot arrive in Berlin at a reasonable hour and reliably continue to Paris the same day, rail loses to aviation by default. Frequency and coordination matter as much as speed.

2. More night trains.

In the short term, night services are the only practical way to cover very long distances without losing an entire day to travel.

3. Long-term: faster lines.

The comparison is sobering. A train from Beijing to Shanghai, roughly 1200 km, takes around 4 hours 40 minutes. A train from Warsaw to Berlin, just 571 km, takes around 6 hours 30 minutes. Who wouldn’t take an Amsterdam to Vienna train if it took 5h? Or Copenhagen Brussels in under 4h?

None of this is about romance or nostalgia. It is about system design. As long as trains are slower, more expensive and less predictable than planes, people will continue to fly. The structural conditions have to change first.

What would make you switch?

@europeanspodcast for having looked at option to go from Amsterdam to places in Germany by night, and having given up, too many connections, and hearing that making connections these days is a whole gamble over there, i don’t want to take the plane for such trips, but it’s really a hard sell.

@europeanspodcast plus it's so hecking EXPENSIVE.

(we were discussing it in the context of summer holidays. If you decide to limit yourself to train travel, it limits your range severely. So I guess we're taking the car again)

@europeanspodcast

One word: reliability.

Last year I took the train from the Netherlands to the south of Spain for work. A trip that should take about 24 hours. My very first train was delayed by an hour and I ended up scrambling to rebook all my trains, booking a last-minute hotel in Paris, and finally taking 48 hours to get to my destination.

A few weeks ago I took the train from Belgium to the south of Spain for work. A trip that should take about 17 hours. My train from Lyon was cancelled without warning and I ended up scrambling to rebook my trains, getting a six-hour BlaBlaCar ride, booking a last-minute hostel in Perpignan, and finally taking 34 hours to get to my destination.

Honestly, I feel like an idiot for even taking the train, but I refuse to fly over these short distances because it's just ridiculous to do so.

@europeanspodcast And if folks want to help make that switch happen they can join us at https://erpu.eu ! We're organizing and bring together the voices of passengers to advocate for those structural changes we need.
European Rail Passengers Union

United for a more connected and sustainable Europe

European Rail Passengers Union
@europeanspodcast Another difference, in the UK at least, is that you can see the plane timetable and book a ticket a year in advance. For trains it's just a few weeks, which is not clever if you're trying to work out whether or not you need to book an extra night in the hotel which may not be available at short notice.
@TimWardCam @europeanspodcast And if you're not on it instantly the minute the timetable goes live you will probably miss the cheaper advance tickets.
@TimWardCam @europeanspodcast for a lot of the UK, trains don't make sense for european journeys either, when it can easily take 3 hours just to reach central London & the Eurostar security containment queue
@TimWardCam @europeanspodcast though if politics had worked out differently & we could have got night trains from major regional cities, as easy as a local train
@patterfloof @TimWardCam @europeanspodcast I agree about the lack of decent long-term advance bookability and timetables. And going via St Pancras is a bit of a headache. Last time I went to France (October), I took the counterintuitive route. From my home (Mansfield), local buses to Chesterfield, train to Newcastle-upon-Tyne, connecting bus to ferry terminal, and overnight ferry to Amsterdam, then train to Amiens (but, even then, illogically, fastest via Paris North). I like overnight travel.
@UkeleleEric @TimWardCam @europeanspodcast while I've not used it, I like the concept of overnight travel, you're making use of the otherwise unused sleep time, rather than spending the first day of your holiday trying to get there
@europeanspodcast I try to go by train in Europe, but Amsterdam to Warsaw was too much time, bad interconnection and no night train when I needed it. So, you are absolutely right.
@europeanspodcast Trains have two big advantages compared to air travel: the station is already in the city centre, and you don’t need to be there 2-3 hours before departure. From Amsterdam that means Brussels and Paris are faster and more comfortable by train than by air. But there are no other destinations served in that way.
@mkoek @europeanspodcast this is assuming you are starting and ending in one of these large cities. Living in the South West of England, albeit we do have a train station in my town, going by train involves a train journey to London then an overnight before catching the Eurostar. And similar on the return. Fortunately I have friends in the capital, not too far from both Paddington and St Pancras who can put me up.
FWIW I have done it, when the destination is well connected but train (Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam) but then journeys that involves planes are also not that easy or cheap either, but can be done in one day.
@europeanspodcast One thing I would love new trains to lean in on more heavily are dedicated compartments whether it's child playground areas, a nice cafe/restaurant, sleeping areas (sleeper trains are nice but is there maybe a daytime lounge version of it?), or dedicated call booths for people travelling for business. These things partially exist already but reliable internet still appears to be a utopia. If they can be fixed, train as default means of transport might become an inevitability.
@europeanspodcast Cheaper tickets! Currently trains that cross the borders are extremely expensive. There is progress on the Netherlands - Belgium border but more is needed.
@europeanspodcast Personally I take the fact they are slower as a positive. When I go on holiday, I don't want the stress of flying, nor the cramped seats of a plane. Rather, I can take the convenience and pace of the train to unwind and arrive at my destination well-rested.
@europeanspodcast In addition to the issues already mentioned, I also miss the ability to check in or cheaply send luggage. (The latter is possible with Yamato/Ta-Q-Bin in Japan & Taiwan for example.) Dragging your bags around is OK if you‘re all able-bodied adults. But it becomes a major pain with kids or mobility-challenged people.
Every year I look whether the family trip to visit my in-laws is doable by train, but it’s just too painful. (~Vienna to Figueras or Perpignan)

@europeanspodcast
To mention the elephant in the room: You would have to flip Germany.

It's a central transit country, and it tries to sabotage trains as hard as legally possible, in an ill-suited attempt to protect it's car industry. If you want an efficient European train network, you must somehow make our politicians win elections for doing longterm investments in the privatized rail network.

@europeanspodcast Long term, sadly, but it's like 30 years overdue. If not more.

The state of non-national high speed rail in the supposedly connected Europe is abysmal.

@europeanspodcast Especially the speed and the convenience would help do it for me.

I was in Brussels recently from Copenhagen by plane. I passed close by Copenhagen Central station, and I think I all in all took 3.5 hours from passing Copenhagen Central to being at Brussel Central. And I had at least 6 different departure times from Copenhagen airport to take from.
I did look at trains, but I got tired just by looking at it.

@europeanspodcast @jon ah excellent! We were talking about this, trying to work it out, just last weekend!

@europeanspodcast @jon My partner and I love train travel! So much more romantic than nasty planes! For a sole passenger in a hurry planes may be OK (although I stopped flying years ago for climate reasons).

If people are travelling for pleasure and to see the countryside, trains are the way to go. Those Scenic Train programmes are great adverts for that.

Even for shorter distance commuters, trains are better than cars and buses! No parking issues, more comfortable and more reliable!

@europeanspodcast @jon

Try the UK, some of the worst train services in Europe, a consequence of privatisation leading to multiple train operating companies. Slowly being put right as train companies come back under government control but still not great.

The best example of the problem is Ticket Splitting - depending on starting point, final destination and intermediate stations, how and where you buy tickets results in different costs.

I have saved up to 50% by ticket splitting.

@gwentlarry Kindly, no. UK is in the mid table in Europe. Trains run regularly at least, although prices can be terrible. But the UK is a lot better than at least half a dozen other European railways. @europeanspodcast

I guess a lot of this is because they have the infrastructure in place already? After hearing Brits complaining I was surprised by how easy it was to travel by train in the UK, but it's probably true that parts of the experience has gotten worse compared to how good it used to be. It's just way ahead of countries that never made the investment in the first place.

Germany seems to me to be in a similar situation.
@jon @gwentlarry @europeanspodcast

@brekke No. Well, or not really. It starts with an attitude: what trains do you want to run, and who for? UK, Germany, Austria, Czechia - it's for everyone, as far as we can, and every line will have an hourly service. France, Spain, Norway - other than in a few urban areas, who would take a train instead of driving? And networks are organised that way. @gwentlarry @europeanspodcast
@europeanspodcast @jon what bugs me most is the booking situation. If I make a phone call to Portugal, I don't need to install an app of every network operator involved from Germany to Portugal. When buying train tickets, this is considered normal.
@bewo001 Which - if you listen to the @europeanspodcast episode - the European Commission is going to start to put right with its forthcoming Regulation. Explained more here https://jonworth.eu/how-to-fix-railway-ticketing-in-the-eu/
How to fix railway ticketing in the EU

We know there is a problem with rail ticketing in the EU - anyone who has ever tried to book trains cross-border has encountered the issues. If you can find the trains you want, you often cannot get prices for the tickets. And even if you can get prices, you

Jon Worth
@europeanspodcast @jon we've frequently done Munich-Cambridge (and the opposite) via train, takes about 12-13hrs.