Subject: Information processing in autism. Is our style necessarily a deficit?

Why do autistic people find new or high-stimulus environments stressful; even overwhelming?

Why can it seem, at times, we're slower than others? To take in scenes; to mentally process them; to make decisions based on them 🤷

This thread is an alternative take on autistic processing style & speed.

👇

(Comments & feedback welcomed, as always!)

#Autism #ActuallyAutistic #EpistemicInjustice #Neurodivergent #AuDHD

The truth is, we autistic people take in a lot!

Both on a sensory level (such as visually) and cognitively (so in terms of information).

When scientists were able to investigate the signals between eye and brain, they were surprised to find that most of the signals moved brain-to-eye, when seeing – and not eye-to-brain, as predicted.

👁️ ⬅️ 🧠

👇

That means that we humans rely a great deal on priors. Stuff we already know.

We are actually ‘seeing’ far less of what’s in front of us that we’d imagine. We’re mostly ‘filling in the gaps’…

It does make sense, of course. I guess that’s how you can drive all the way home from work without noticing.

👇

I’m remembering an anecdote about a time Lorna Wing was looking at a dolls’ house with a young autistic boy.

She pointed at the bed and asked, “What’s this?” He answered, “A bed.” She pointed at the cover. He said, “A quilt.” Finally, she pointed at the pillow. He replied, “It’s a piece of ravioli.”

Somewhat astonished, she looked more closely – and saw that it did indeed look just like a piece of ravioli.   

👇

In effect, the boy was not allowing his pre-existing beliefs to cloud his judgement about that piece of ravioli on the bed 😉

All told, could it be that, as autistic people, we’re simply taking in more signals from the outside world than most?

The research of Pellicano and Burr suggests autistic perception seems indeed to rely less heavily on expectations and preconceptions than the norm.

We may, in fact, be more ‘eye to brain’, so to speak.

👇

All of this means it can be a) more tiring, and b) more time-consuming for us to move through the world, taking it in.

This can make everyday environments more effortful (more processing load, more filtering required), which can feel more tiring and sometimes slower.

This could also account for why autistic people need a lot of low-stimulus downtime, to recover from it all. Anyone would!

End of thread 🧵

Refs below.

@KatyElphinstone This likely has a direct connection to the phrase "just tune it out" that we get all the time, especially with hearing and auditory processing. For whatever reason, I guess the NT brain just has better active filtering on the senses than the autistic brain? I'm blind, but from what I understand that degree of filtering is virtually required for vision to function, as the eyes generate a ton of spurious information such as motion blur on their own, not to mention the sheer amount of detail they can capture, and so the brain subjects it to heavy filtering to try and build a coherent mental perception. With ears, all the info is coming into the auditory cortex which also has to build a coherent mental perception (sound) out of it. And I guess that either the auditory cortex or whatever its output goes to just can have different degrees of filtering? These can be slightly manipulated by people, actually. It's a myth that blind people literally *hear* better than people who are not blind, but the case could theoretically be made that they *listen* better? Their brain, consciously or subconsciously, assigned more processing to their ears than a person who has to spend all that bandwidth on visual input instead. Although I haven't looked at correlations between blindness and auditory processing disorders and likelihood of overstimulation, I wonder if anyone's done research on that!
Edit: Not sure about auditory processing disorders and overstimulation specifically, but there is certainly evidence to suggest that the auditory cortex adapts itself to be more capable of perceiving detail. The example they use here in sound frequency and motion, and the frequency part might have something to do with that anecdotal correlation between blindness and enhanced pitch perception and musicality. https://www.washington.edu/news/2019/04/22/brains-of-blind-people-adapt-to-sharpen-sense-of-hearing-study-shows/
Brains of blind people adapt to sharpen sense of hearing, study shows

Research from the University of Washington uses functional MRI to identify two differences in the brains of blind individuals -- differences that might be responsible for their abilities to make...

UW News

@x0 This rhymes with some research I stumbled across a while ago, or may even be the same one with different presentation.

The part that caught my attention was (IIRC) fMRI results that showed a surprising level of activity in an area of the brain previously thought to be primarily involved in visual processing, in blind subjects.

The revised hypothesis was that it's actually used for building and maintaining a spatial image of one's physical surroundings, and that it's simply dominated by visual information in sighted people. In blind people, information from the other senses is no longer being flooded out. That would support your idea of a bandwidth constraint.
@KatyElphinstone