@usmu
Thanks so much for your concern. I have strong faith that my connections with will will lead to something great. If you get time, shall we have a video chat?
@usmu @nuwagaba2 @demi I dissent
"Free markets" work well when all participants have equal access to information, can come and go and are protected from fraudsters (a role for the state - fraudsters are rare but frequently encounted unless hunted and disabled)
Markets do not make plans
Markets only act in the short term
Those of us who buy and sell trinkets on platforms like Trade Me get an appreciation of Markets
Those of us locked out of decent housing get an entirely different view
@Daojoan "if the free market was really free, General Motors would be selling crack cocaine"
- Michael Moor (approximately)
A large sledgehammer makes it behave well
The more risk is involved in a transaction, the more regulation is required, both from within and without.
The "Free" Market is a glib lie. We want a Fair Market.
Neoliberal capitalism only cares about profit. It is a race to the bottom where in the end winner takes all. Humans are not even part of the equation, neither is wellbeingβ¦
The model is wrong.
@Daojoan βfree marketsβ are a myth in any case. There are all sorts of constraints on any market, only some of which are intentional.
The legal constraints we do or donβt choose to apply reflect the morality of those in power, and power is certainly not brokered in a βfree marketβ.
@Dwampre_Scorrigank "free markets" in economic parlance means something completely different to the way neoliberal and libertarians use it.
It means
'no barriers to entry it exit, or to trade/transactions', like tariffs or imperfect information or monopoly market power or barriers to market like subsidies.
Not
'No fucken rules, yeeiiw! Who wants to buy these kidneys I just acquired?', or 'stick em in a cage with knives and we'll give the job to the survivor'.
Markets must be regulated if they are to act as 'free markets', because the 'free market' model takes centuries to reach equilibrium on its own.
There is a clear reason for that.
Markets are formed by rules. Without rules there is no market, just a bunch of traders.
A market is a place, where people meet to exchange work, goods and values. Like a classical flee market or local farmers market.
This place is owned by someone. The owners are often not the ones, who manage the market.
The market manager establishes the rules (Which can't be against the will of the owner.)
And the merchants will not be encouraged or very active, if the rules are shitty for them.
The markets of our national economies are owned by the sovereign, us.
But the rules are made by the legislation.
Before rules, there were only two people, meeting and exchanging things, they agree on.
But on a market, you are forced to use the units of a certain payment system (money), use calibrated weights, need to put price tags on goods and so on.
You are not allowed to put cheap stones on the bottom and only some apples on top.
Without rules, ancient and especially modern markets collapse quickly.
The same applies to European single market. The place is just much bigger than a traditional flee market.
You want to sell something here? Stick to the rules!
Have you ever seen a market manager of a flee market? Walking around proudly like a boss.
Don't try to put your booth there without asking and paying the fee.
You will be kicked out of the market in no time.
And they won't be friendly.
@Daojoan In "Assholes: A Theory" the author spends a chapter or two on what he calls "asshole capitalism".
He differentiates a market that is regulated to be free (you don't just get that) from unregulated, "asshole capitalism" where its just about who's the biggest asshole who can most effectively abuse the market and there being no laws to stop them.
There is no such thing as a free market, no invisible hand, just the filthy rich given free reign to steal without any tax, visible or invisible.

The free market sorted it out with guillotines and torches