We used to have working spelling and grammar checkers. Why does everybody in tech pretend you need a whole-ass LLM to check for typos?
@baldur
And translations
And text to speech was working good in most cases
@UkeleleEric @baldur @wikiyu don't know whether that's a good example, because the difference is clear even devoid of context, PLUS existing LLMs have no problem with that difference at all. (The two phrases are only similar to the human reader. You're projecting things that are easy to make mistakes on for humans to machine translation! (see attached Deep-L)
I'm also not sure rule based & Bayesian translation makes a lot of difference when it comes to sarcasm. That's sentiment detection!