@arstechnica Hold on...a MSFT product that does not ship with Copilot...?

@plwt @arstechnica

It’s a Microsoft Research project, not a product. There are a lot of challenges to turn it into a product (not least of which is that it requires very high quality optical glass, which makes it more expensive than alternative storage systems).

[ I didn’t work on this project, the team behind it was one floor down ]

@david_chisnall @arstechnica I was tooting half in jest.

This is really awesome technology and even if it does not go anywhere, it is really valuable that people are working on projects like this.

@plwt @arstechnica

But it does require a trained AI system to read the data. How likely is anyone 10,000 years from now to know exactly what is required?

@arstechnica

My opera singer friends would like a word

@arstechnica "very stable medium" sounds like Donald Trump's dead grandma.

@arstechnica Are they going to reserve it explicitly for cloud and AI providers?

They're aiming for a new dark ages where we don't have local storage or backup under our own control. It'll all be subject to their inspection and plagiarism.

@arstechnica but you'll still need to maintain your subscription...
@arstechnica Wow! Now they have somewhere to store all that copilot slop.
Microsoft’s Project Silica offers robust thousand-year storage

Project Silica extends storage reliability goals from "decades" to "centuries."

Ars Technica

@arstechnica

I was thinking that in some #StarTrek original series they stored data in crystals. Maybe the crystals were actually etched glass.

@arstechnica

It would be a shame if space aliens came here 10,000 years from now to understand our extinction, and all they could find was data from the Square Kilometer Array.