#SCOTUS Adopts ‘New’ Process To Avoid #ConflictsOfInterest 20 Years Too Late

The justices announce conflict-checking #software & new filing rules that lower #courts have used forever.

Only the #SupremeCourt could announce a bare minimum #ethical #guardrail that lower courts have used since the George W. Bush administration & act like it’s a bold blow against the appearance of impropriety.

#law #LegalEthics
https://abovethelaw.com/2026/02/supreme-court-adopts-new-process-to-avoid-conflicts-of-interest-20-years-too-late/

Supreme Court Adopts ‘New’ Process To Avoid Conflicts Of Interest 20 Years Too Late

The justices announce conflict-checking software and new filing rules that lower courts have used forever.

Above the Law

#SCOTUS announced Tuesday that it will now employ #software to help the justices identify when they should probably #recuse themselves from cases. We say “probably,” because there’s still no actually enforceable #ethics code binding #SupremeCourt justices & the #ChiefJustice has made very clear that he will ignore any attempt to impose one. Instead, the Supreme Court drafted a 14-page pinky swear that they will follow some of the same rules that bind lower court judges.

#law #LegalEthics

According to this toothless document, the justices aren’t supposed to hear matters where they have direct financial stakes in the parties. Thus, this new #software package & a tweak to the filing rules to require parties include their stock ticker symbols.

To be clear, lower #court #judges have been using conflict-checking software since 2007. #SCOTUS first hinted that it might start using conflict-checking software in 2023. After that, the Court went silent….

#law #LegalEthics

827 days later: mission accomplished!

Gabe Roth of Fix the Court put a fine point on the situation∶

“Per their most recent disclosures, only two justices, Chief Justice #Roberts & Justice #Alito, own individual stocks, with the former holding shares in two companies & the latter holding shares in more than two dozen.

#SCOTUS #law #LegalEthics

“So although the new rule is a net positive since it comes in service of the full Court’s adoption of conflict-check software, it’s not a major improvement, & it should not have taken 827 days post-Code to implement. That’s especially true since lower court #judges have been required to use software-based conflict screening for 20 years, & several justices have been rumored to continue to use it after they were elevated.”

#SCOTUS #law #LegalEthics

Justice Alito’s stock portfolio has become a recurring subplot in the Court’s ongoing ethics drama. Just last month, #Alito recused himself—right before oral arguments—from the high-profile #Chevron USA v. Plaquemines Parish case because of his holdings in #ConocoPhillips, whose subsidiary Burlington Resources remained a party in the lower court proceedings. Alito holds stock in more than two dozen companies & accounts for roughly a third of all recusals at the Court.

#SCOTUS #law #LegalEthics

Meanwhile, the other 7 justices have figured out how to manage their finances without being ethical drags upon the Court [in terms of stock investments only. #ClarenceThomas is absolutely an ethical drag]. The #SupremeCourt took over 2 years to institute a new #software solution to fix a problem that exists solely because these 2 refuse to divest from the market as a small price to pay for being the nation’s SuperLegislature.

#SCOTUS #law #LegalEthics

@Nonilex Venezuela was a pure corporate war