Married and own a home by 30 years old in the US

1960: 52%
1970: 48%
1980: 45%
1990: 43%
2000: 35%
2010: 25%
2025: 12%

I’m sure everything is fine.

@FluentInFinance
Now do married, and own a cat.
@notyourfanboy @FluentInFinance I mean, even aggregated over the entire cat's lifetime, I suspect it's still orders of magnitude cheaper than a wedding and a mortgage.
@FluentInFinance I'd really love to see the stats divided up. Because my suspicion is it's mostly if not entirely an inability to afford houses, but pairing it with marriage means it could also be that people are just not getting married as much anymore as we discover polyamory, aromanticism, and anti-establisment sentiments
@raphaelmorgan @FluentInFinance I'd throw in that marriage is a net negative for women in many respects, especially marriage to Nazis, er, TradHubs. And the economic driver of requiring a husband to "support" them has evaporated. Not getting married is probably a very rational decision for most women.

@oddhack @raphaelmorgan @FluentInFinance yes, this. The economic and social reality for women in the 1950’s pretty much mandated marriage.

They shouldn’t have been conflated in this set of statistics.

@FluentInFinance maggots looking at these stats "that 12% is all undocumented migrants & trans, so no, it's not fine, if that 12% were only MAGA folk, it is all great. Let me go worship my migrant billionaire overlord now".

@FluentInFinance

The Dow is over 50,000
Quit your whining, terrorist!!!

@FluentInFinance

I would say there's a similar picture in Germany.

@FluentInFinance apologies for cluelessness, but to be clear, does "own a home" mean taken out a mortgage, or paid off the mortgage?
@tartley @FluentInFinance I'd assume it's ignoring mortgage as a factor, and counting everything as ‘owning’ even if a lender owns the other 99% of the place, but indeed there is ambiguity

@zbrown @tartley @FluentInFinance there's still a vast difference between owning and renting;

You rent, that's money that's just gone every month. You have a mortgage: that's money you're saving up every month (minus the interest).

@tartley @FluentInFinance
Considering only my parents and my situation, taken out a mortgage.
Now my grandmother was able to pay cash for a house in mid 1930s with a war bond her husband bought in early 20s.
@FluentInFinance I wouldn't combine marital status with real estate ownership; the decline of the first one isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Another caveat, if the idea is to demonstrate the decline of income by the decline of young couples with houses, there might be other, stronger reasons than economical ones why people don't buy houses and procreate right after school/uni anymore.
@Schafstelze @FluentInFinance Thank you! Was going to say the same -- certainly things are bad but both marriage and home ownership are concepts that could be questioned as the status quo to aspire to.
@Schafstelze @FluentInFinance exactly what I thought. Any numbers on not married and own a house?
You would at least need to separate the two to make an economic argument about it.
@FluentInFinance what are the statistics for singles who own a home? I know they are lower, but I'm curious how low
@FluentInFinance The purpose is what the system is doing, namely concentrating power beyond the reach of democratic control.
@FluentInFinance why is it important to own a home when you’re married?
@FluentInFinance how many have their pensions tied to the military industry
@FluentInFinance Curious how those numbers compare to, say, 1920-1950
@FluentInFinance Map that against wealth distribution upward since 1960.
@FluentInFinance Ouch. What's the source for these statistics?
@FluentInFinance речь именно про частный дом? Или про любое жилье? Я так понимаю невыплаченные кредиты тоже входят в эти 12%, сколько из этих 12% потеряют жилье из-за кризиса и невозможности выплатить кредит? Если про дом, то 12% это еще не так печально, в РФ думаю все куда хуже.

@FluentInFinance
Population

1960 3 billion
2026 8.3 billion

@FluentInFinance Can you state a source?
@promovicz @FluentInFinance +1 source would be appreciated
@promovicz @FluentInFinance I observe that the OP does not actually seem to engage people here - at all. He just dumps posts from his blog, probably trying to drive traffic there. Pointless to follow him.

@FluentInFinance Do the two properties also behave the same when observed separately? Is it home ownership or marriage that is pulling the numbers down? Or do they correlate?

Asking since home ownership is mainly an economic consideration, while marriage is arguably more of a culture/lifestyle thing.

@FluentInFinance In terms of marriage and home ownership, I (b. late 1960s) followed the same trajectory as my parents (b. mid-late 1930s), but about 10 years later. They were married around age 20 and bought a home around age 25; I was married around age 30 and bought a home around age 35.
@FluentInFinance Can I see "own a home" without the relationship model predefined? Because I'm interested i n the economic aspect, not the marietal one...

@FluentInFinance a few weeka ago I saw this on linkedin, compared to the "median starter home size" & that is imho relevant part if the equation...

https://www.builderscapital.com/blog/starter-homes

Not saying the US is not fucked but also expectations & market availability of homes of a certain size are part of the equation...

Where Have All the Starter Homes Gone?

@FluentInFinance

Data source?

@weekend_editor @[email protected] I was a homeowner before age 30 but I wasn't married so I don't get included in the 1980's line segment. Why did they restrict it to married?

@nosrednayduj

@FluentInFinance hasn't (yet) revealed the source of the data, so we can't (yet) judge its reliability or purpose.

But I *think* the idea was to point out the decline in what used to be described as an established start in life: owning a home and being married.

While that measure of "being established" may have been the cultural norm in the past, it seems at least slightly dubious now. Now we'd need to include all sorts of households and all sorts of relationships that previously flew under the legal radar.

So we could use the data to say something about the decline in marriage, with some controversy and difficulty of interpretation.

But we could also use it to say something about the low availability and astronomical pricing of housing, which makes it much harder on people rising into adulthood now.

Perhaps @FluentInFinance will let us know his source and their intent.

@FluentInFinance since when was the percentage of people being married a measure of being fine? 🤨
@FluentInFinance It's the 5 dollar coffee. For sure it's the 5 dollar coffee.