Part of the reason for the USA's failure is MAGA but the other big aspect is a left that does not engage the real enemy

Toxic idealism

Spineless capitulation

Mindless cynicism

"Polite society" "high road" cluelessness

And lazy entitlement

Not financial entitlement but this obtuse entitled foolishness that we have the time and space to criticize some aspect of the left according to deranged standards of perfection when we're facing literal fascism

Make MAGA the target of your venom

@benroyce
1 of 2
What does that even mean?
Toxic Idealism. You are just taking an ugly word, toxic, and put it in front of a beautiful word, Idealism. There is no such thing.

Spineless capitulation exists across the political spectrum.

Mindless cynicism is far more emblematic of the right

The rest is mostly true except the graphic should have far more blue hands to represent how the left vastly outnumbers the right.

@davoyager

Toxic idealism is when there is a better choice but it is scorned or attacked because it is not ideal

There is only better or worse in this world. There will never be any other choice. Forever

So people who do not choose better because they are walled off into inaction by their foolish toxic idealism are only aiding fascism

This sort of inept idiocy is a very real phenomenon unfortunately

Perfect is not the enemy of good

But plenty of morons insist it must be

@benroyce To say the left largely suffers from what you call toxic idealism is incorrect. We have learned through hard experience that we will never achieve the perfect and so have had to settle for the good time and time again. The ACA is a great example. We wanted universal health care but were unable to achieve that and so had to settle for what we could get through the corrupt Senate. Some people yes, especially young people, but as a whole you are wrong. The left compromises.

@davoyager

we are currently suffering through 4 more years of trump as a direct consequence of assholes staying home and not voting for harris

some of this is racism

but some of it is toxic idealism: demanding something better before they get off their lazy entitled ass and prevent fascism

@benroyce and a great deal of it is sexism.
Imagine if all those idiots in 2000 hadn't voted for Ralph Nader or stayed home instead of voting for Gore.
It would be a totally different world today.

@benroyce @davoyager

I think 2000 can be more accurately blamed on Florida just blatantly stealing the election than people staying home

@gbargoud @davoyager

florida 2000 wasn't example of people staying home, it was an example of the other problem: idiots who don't understand what a third party vote means in an FPTP voting system

certainly moron nader voters didn't put bush into the win column, what they did was put the results into the hands of a shitbag supreme court

@davoyager @benroyce

When voters were purged from the rolls before the election and then ballots were not counted for various badly defined reasons after the election leading to the governor's brother winning the state by a razor thin margin, I find it hard to blame voters themselves even if fewer Nader voters would have made the margins large enough to block that theft.

@gbargoud @davoyager

i mean it can all be true right?

and when you look at how many voted for nader, and how thin the margin was, it's pretty obvious that played a roll. and i will castigate such morons for helping to give us bush

@davoyager @benroyce

Looking back on the 2000 election (which happened before I lived in the US citizen or turned 18 so I didn't really follow it that hard at the time) it is wild just how fucking corrupt that was right out in the open

@gbargoud @davoyager @benroyce Though Clinton's sexual exploits disgust me, the whole 'getting revenge for Nixon' vibe of the right was pretty sad. They impeached him over whether or not 'sexual relations' meant 'intercourse' or not; after six years of DESPERATELY trying to pin ANYTHING on him with regard to WhiteWater (which is such small potatoes compared with Trump's many scams as to be truly laughable now) The right's been blatantly corrupt and morally bankrupt a LONG time.

@davoyager @benroyce @obscurestar

I'm just amazed that there are people who keep getting elected to national positions in the democratic party who just let such blatant election theft slide.

They should have been primaried a quarter century ago and we're still dealing with their shit.

@gbargoud @davoyager @obscurestar

I blame nonvoters

It's a feedback of alienation. Things suck, so they detach. So things suck more. Rinse repeat

I'm not letting leaders off the hook. But you can't change who they are. Meanwhile if people just fucking voted we could get rid of them

Someone might say "well you can't change nonvoters either." In that case we're just fucked. I don't accept that. So I prefer to hammer at the one thing we might be able to change:

Nonvoters, fucking vote already

@benroyce @gbargoud @davoyager Yeah. I know how you feel but at the same time, shaming isn't a good tool for reaching people and helping them grow. Tends to re-enforce negative behaviors instead. Lest I become too much a purity troll myself, I try to lay my shaming of them aside so that I might focus on reaching them. It's just hard. I'd like to not be political too. If they could just see we are all the same light and let go of preconceptions, the right would not exist. It is made of fear.

@obscurestar @gbargoud @davoyager

I understand what you're saying about shaming but I can't buy it

"I'm not voting because someone was mean on Mastodon" is ridiculous. The concept describes someone so emotionally addled they won't ever figure out how to coherently advocate for their own self-interests, nevermind all of our interests

So shaming of nonvoters is for everyone else reading along who aren't so incompetent

Respecting low emotional intelligence is not a path to anything constructive

@benroyce @obscurestar @gbargoud @davoyager Really. Grown ups need to put on their grownup pants. It is exhausting to have to infantilize the right and the complacent to try to communicate with them. They’ve been proven to actually be able to look things up after elections happen — things they should’ve questioned before voting. Searches for key issues surge. They do have brains, albeit ones they seem to keep on idle too often.
@benroyce @obscurestar @gbargoud @davoyager We tried being nice to republicans and non-voters. We are now here. We tried it the easy way and republicans and non-voters failed. Now it is time for the hard way where non-voters' feelings get hurt and hopefully get the message this time.
@benroyce @gbargoud @davoyager It is ridiculous. People behave in childish ways.The don't need to confess the error of their ways to me and prostrate themselves at my feet in apology for the horrors they've unleashed. If they can just step up and do the right thing now, that's a good start. Better than any words of apology.
@benroyce
There are nonvoters on both sides, probably the most in the lower classes.. Getting more people to vote won't change anything in a favourable direction.. The system itself has to change.
@gbargoud @davoyager @obscurestar

@FransVeldman @gbargoud @davoyager @obscurestar

agreed

with the tweak that the margins are so close in big elections that a little appeal to just the left leaning nonvoters can matter

the other side knows that: the psyop out there artificially boosts MAGA confidence and artificially suppresses leftist confidence

so there is no doubt in my mind you are correct but that doesn't mean an appeal to *leftist* nonvoters is fruitless. nobody here is trying to appeal to right wing nonvoters

@benroyce it helps to have people step up to run. There are far too many complacent incumbents who run unopposed. AOC came to office just by stepping up to primary a lazy incumbent. He didn't even deign to debate the upstart young chit. Then he got his ass handed to him by the chit. Someone needs to run against each failed leader. Even if they don't ultimately defeat the incumbent, they help keep pols accountable by forcing them to earn some votes instead of feeling entitled to collect them automatically. Ideally of course there would be strong alternatives who do win. But having to run a competitive race at all is a tug toward the left when all of their advisors are telling them to pander to the center and right. It matters.

@benroyce it's not fair to blame nonvoters when systematic vote suppression has been a major strategy of the Republican party for nearly half a century, and has been a feature of US policy since the founding. We still have many people officially disenfranchised, including people who have served their time, and many more who have been deliberately removed from voter rolls or intimidated from showing up.

Yes, there are also some people who genuinely don't care. But that too is a product of strategy and execution. We're deliberately meant to feel hopeless and disengaged. The cure isn't to condemn people for falling victim to it, but for the DNC and grassroots left to help them engage with issues in a way that gives them a reason to exercise their vote. Like, feeling empowered to change their income, their tax burden, their healthcare costs, their childcare costs, the quality of their kids' schools, the precariousness of their employment, etc. Give them reasons to take an unpaid day off work, stand on line for four hours under the armed watch of ICE "monitors", and mark their ballot. These are things worth fighting for, but the GOP has made sure that a fight it will be.

@cczona

not in a million years does castigation of nonvoters have anything to do with people who *can't* vote. it's only about people who *choose* not to vote

in fact, to win back voting rights, that's even more reason to show up and vote

secondly, if someone is psyoped into not voting, that is on them. it's a personal weakness they need to get over

thirdly, the dem party sucks and will not offer up these issues. we need to replace them. by voting (in the primaries). proof: mamdani

@cczona @benroyce

One common way that voter suppression is done is by looking at the number of voters in the previous year and sizing the polling stations based on that even if there is a candidate who has people more excited or a population shift.

So on top of everything else showing up for boring candidates means you're making sure that when there's a good candidate in the future, they can't say "no one showed up last year so we're shrinking the polling place"

@gbargoud @cczona

absolutely, they make voting harder

they also make laws like "you can't bring bottled water to people waiting in line to vote"

https://www.abc27.com/news/is-it-illegal-to-hand-out-water-or-food-outside-your-polling-place/

(this has since been struck down in many places)

but we're only talking about a few more hours of waiting

it shouldn't deter

especially since we reverse such meddling if we show up

we also ask people to protest and strike: those are much greater efforts (we need to do all 3). i see plenty of elderly at protests

@cczona @benroyce

That reminds me of the democracy sausage in Australia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_sausage

Anyway the reason I mention the sizing thing is because on the surface, sizing a polling place based on turnout the previous year is a perfectly legitimate strategy for sizing it if context is ignored so breaking that is important since I don't think there is any recourse other than setting state level laws for how to size polling places (which is not happening without turning out to vote anyway)

Democracy sausage - Wikipedia

@gbargoud @cczona

exactly the ultimate lesson:

when they throw up barriers to voting

that should result in just more determination to vote

because that is the only way to fix it

@benroyce "only a few more hours of waiting"?? How privileged are you, that you would trivialize that. For many people that's the difference between still having a job in the morning or their kids getting picked up from school. Depending on weather, standing in an outdoor queue for hours can also be an extreme hardship for people with certain medical conditions or disabilities. That's why denying them water assistance is specifically used as a tactic.

@cczona

"For many people that's the difference between still having a job in the morning or their kids getting picked up from school... also be an extreme hardship for people with certain medical conditions or disabilities"

then you are talking about someone who cannot vote, and are therefore classifying such a person as someone forced to not vote

and i agree

so not someone who chooses not to vote

right?

you call me privileged, i say you are lying about the topic

> we also ask people to protest and strike: those are much greater efforts (we need to do all 3). i see plenty of elderly at protests

... That's a weird take. Less than 3% of American are showing up to protests and strikes. Far more show up to vote, yet you are scapegoating the smaller percentage of people who don't make it to the polls on election day vs the overwhelming percentage who aren't at any given strike. The reality is that it takes sacrifices to do either, and both require a lot of grassroots mobilization work in order to increase turnout. No amount of scolding people can substitute for being at their front door and listening thoughtfully to what their concerns are.

@cczona

"That's a weird take"

as someone who goes to protests, it's called using my eyeballs

"No amount of scolding people"

i do not in a million years think i can scold some toxic idealist or mindless cynic who has no impediments to voting but still does not vote. these people are rat poison. don't defend their entitled laziness

it's for the sake of everyone else, who can still think, reading along

and i ask you to think, and stop lying that those who choose not to = those who can't

@benroyce @cczona

> if someone is psyoped into not voting, that is on them. it's a personal weakness they need to get over

no. it's not a personal weakness if a psyop against you succeeds. saying that only contributes to the fracturing.

it's on us, as part of societal fabric, to build resilience against such psyops. we all should work to reduce and remove barriers; some of them are these ops from either rival parties targeting demographic groups or hostile foreign actors just trying to suppress all voting or anywhere in between.

@draNgNon @cczona

i disagree

malice exists in the world

nothing will ever change that

to retreat merely because one sees menace is a personal failure

if someone hears "donald trump is trying to stop the vote and so it's not worth it for you to try to vote" from some troll and they agree that is 100% on the character and intellectual failures of that person

we need to fight. we need a backbone. anyone who will not fight and has no backbone is no ally. we demand they grow a fucking backbone

@benroyce actually it is indeed what you are doing. Voter suppression includes discouraging and/or detering people from exercising their rights. Things like scheduling elections during work hours, understaffing polling places in select areas to force long wait times, stricter ID requirements, propaganda arms such as Fox News, etc. Many nonvoters are nonvoters because their votes have been strategically and systematically targeted for decades by vote suppression efforts. Blaming the victims for their own oppression is not a perspective I accept and I encourage you to think deeper about where that mindset leads.

@cczona

please explain to me how:

being forced to not vote even when you want to,

and choosing not to vote when you have no impediment to do so,

is the same thing

explain that

you can't

because they are not remotely the same thing

it is false to suggest those are the same situations

@benroyce you are the one conflating them all as "nonvoters" and laying blame on those "nonvoters" whose attempts are successfully suppressed.

@cczona

so this what? the third or fourth time i've said that those who choose not to vote are a different situation than those who are forced not to vote

and what do you have for me?

an insistence that what i have clearly stated a number of times now is not what i am really saying

awesome

bad faith lying engagement

will you fucking read and comprehend the words in front of you instead of running on the autopilot of lying bias about what i am saying?

are you trolling or incoherent?

@obscurestar @gbargoud @davoyager @benroyce They impeached him because he lied. Part of his lying was trying to use the definition of sex to skate over his lying. But, looking at the scope of corruption today, that seems trivial.
@gbargoud @benroyce It all started with Nixon
@gbargoud @benroyce yes there was cheating just like there will be in 26 and 28. Dems have to vote in large enough numbers to overwhelm

@davoyager @gbargoud

that's it

unfortunately you hear moron voices going "well if they cheat why vote"

fucking cowardly losers

@benroyce @gbargoud
again if enough people voted for Gore instead of Nader we would have won
@gbargoud @benroyce
Actually as usual the fault lies at the feet of a corrupt and corrupted supreme court. Sandra Day O'Connor even said she regrets her vote as wrong.
But if enough people voted for Gore this would never have happened