We now live in a world where a country can just kidnap (and probably shoot with a bullet in the neck above the ocean) a president from another country just because they feel like it.
Let that sink in.
We now live in a world where a country can just kidnap (and probably shoot with a bullet in the neck above the ocean) a president from another country just because they feel like it.
Let that sink in.
@mysteriarch No. There is no precedent as far as I know.
Every other country leader who was violently removed by another country was in the context of a war.
Ngo Dinh Diem, Vietnam
Fidel Castro (failed) and Che Guevara, Cuba
Rafael Trujillo, Dominican Republic
Patrice Lubumbashi, Congo
Salvador Allende, Chile
Muammar Gaddafi, Libya
And the list of countries that the US has bombed since WW2 is too long for a post here but there are over 50 in South America alone.
@[email protected] @mysteriarch And how is any of the examples you're mentioning the same?
(Edit: a word was missing. Also if you're a dick and mock a non-native speaker's English, including mine, but not exclusively, you're an asshole and it's an instant block)
What knowing of that sentence means?
Paul Singer won his Citgo lawsuit.
According to Trump, there's nothing the US military won't do for his megadonors.
Looting a nation's natural resources is now expected practice.
Paul Singer has done this before. Regime change. Seizing ships.
Rubio & Singer go way back
https://prospect.org/2025/12/01/marco-rubios-sales-pitch-war-in-venezuela/
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/08/27/paul-singer-doomsday-investor
A nation that can't afford to feed its own people or have a health system, yet has $ for world wars.