Randahl Fink
Give it 24 hours, and Trump will claim he was totally exonerated by the released Epstein files, because his name was not visible ANYWHERE in the files, as anyone can clearly see from these two example pages:
Dec 21 at 8:59amIvory for iOS
Show threadHashbangperlDec 21
@randahl there's one they missed, and its massively incriminating.
Show threadSean LynchDec 21

@hashbangperl @randahl

They missed, but have since gone back and redacted it. See the link below for a side to side comparison
https://mastodon.social/deck/@opdeathe[email protected]/115757709329021532

Show threadHashbangperlDec 23
@SeanPLynch @randahl https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00020517.pdf is worth checking and sharing
Show threadHashbangperlDec 23
@SeanPLynch @randahl make sure to download before it is further redacted or deleted
Show threadRainerDec 21
@randahl
Isn't that a true-to-life portrayal of his way of thinking and his character?
Show threadxs4me2Dec 21
@randahl 😬
Show threadamaliaDec 21
@randahl Just as he always claimed!
Show threadamaliaDec 21
@randahl Just as he always claimed!
Show threadCat WestDec 21
@randahl Pretty sure that since the order was given to redact his name from all the files, that he was literally, all over every page.
Show threadElectropictDec 21

@randahl

We should refer in future only ever to the currently squatting US President ██████ █ █████.

Show threadA Guy Named Ed.Dec 21
@randahl I've seen enough. #Guilty
Show threadSean LynchDec 21

@randahl

Here's a good example of where the DOJ originally missed a few instances of Trump's name, and of a few other powerful Epstein clients, but has since gone back and redacted the names as part of the pedophile protection racket:

https://mastodon.social/deck/@opdeathe[email protected]/115757709329021532

Show threadSerge 🔻Dec 21
@randahl Both 100% innocent and a victim of terrible unfairness. Like always.
Show threadHarryDec 21

@randahl

There is no reason to black out an entire image just to protect the identity of either the victims or the perpetrators. Faces and identifying information can be blacked out or blurred. What is happening in the photo must be so damning that the public can't know that a photo of it exists. This is the opposite of exoneration - hundreds of condemnations for everyone to see.

Show threadMichael WymanDec 21
@randahl the conservative-owned US media is itching to loudly trumpet such a claim, without providing any context about the reactions.