David G. Wells’ “The Penguin dictionary of curious and interesting…” books are excellent and have been great source of inspiration for me.

They are now are almost 30 years old.

What new entries would you put in these books—either because they’re new after publication, or could have (should have) been included at the time?

#mathematics #geometry #books #bookstodon #askfedi

Some suggestions for curious and interesting ‘Numbers’ based on personal knowledge (or ignorance). What would you add?

Sum of three palindromes (Javier Cilleruelo, Florian Luca and Lewis Baxter; try it at https://somethingorotherwhatever.com/sum-of-3-palindromes h/t @christianp)

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem (Andrew Wiles)

Twin primes conjecture is still open, but there are infinitely many pairs of primes that differ by 246 (Yitang Zhang, James Maynard and Terence Tao @tao)

#mathematics #number #askfedi

The incredible palindromic hat-trick

Some suggestions for curious and interesting ‘Geometry’, more in my comfort zone but still plenty of ignorance 😊

What would you add?

Aperiodic monotile (Smith, Myers, Kaplan & Goodman-Strauss)

Noperthedron (Steininger & Yurkevich)

Progress in various packing problems (https://erich-friedman.github.io/packing/)

15 types of convex pentagonal tilings (Rao and others)

Solving cubics with origami (Beloch & Lill; see http://origametry.net/papers/amer.math.monthly.118.04.307-hull.pdf)

#mathematics #geometry #askfedi

Erich's Packing Center

Now for curious and interesting ‘Puzzles’.

What would you add?

Sudoku

Thinking / puzzle video games like Sokoban

Hmm, I like puzzles but my knowledge is a bit thin (and we no longer have a galvanising figure like Martin Gardner.)

#mathematics #puzzle #puzzles #askfedi

Now suggestions for curious and interesting ‘Mathematics’. This means strange facts, anecdotes, paradoxes, portraits of eccentric mathematicians, mathematical philosophy, quotes and mathematics education.

“The only way to learn mathematics is to do mathematics.” – Paul R. Halmos

“Mathematics is not about numbers, equations, computations, or algorithms: it is about understanding.” – William Paul Thurston

“The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not ‘Eureka!’ but ‘That’s funny…’” — Isaac Asimov

“I used to think that maths teachers were all teaching the same subject, some doing it better than others. I now believe that there are *two effectively different subjects being taught under the same name, ‘mathematics’.*’

...‘relational understanding’ [means]… knowing both what to do and why. Instrumental understanding I would until recently not have regarded as understanding at all. It is what I have in the past described as ‘rules without reasons’, without realising that for many pupils *and their teachers* the possession of such a rule, and ability to use it, was what they meant by ‘understanding’.” Richard Skemp (https://atm.org.uk/write/MediaUploads/Journals/MT077/Relational_Understanding_and_Instrumental_Understanding_–_Richard_R._Skemp.pdf)

#mathematics #MathEd #MathsEd #iTeachMath #iTeachMaths #education #AskFedi #books #quote #quotes

@foldworks I've been thinking about the early childhood math curriculum since, well, I was a early child myself.

My idea is to introduce the Stern-Brocot tree, the Symmetry Group of the Square, Pascal's Triangle, and computer programming to youngsters.

These are all incredibly fertile concepts that set up future lessons about mathematics, in lessons that are likely appropriate for children, others that are more likely to be appropriate for teens, and even others that are more likely to be appropriate for undergraduate or even graduate students.

I am very keen on finding concepts that meaningfully connect to advanced research-level mathematics, but are also approachable by the youngest children.

https://github.com/constructive-symmetry/constructive-symmetry

@leon_p_smith
Yes, I think programming can be a good way to learn mathematics (and more).

Seymour Papert wrote about this in Mindstorms (1980).

I was fortunate to learn Logo and turtle programming on a modest home computer in my early teens. I don't know which was cause and which was effect, but I still like geometry and programming today.

For those not familiar with Mindstorms, a good summary is at
https://medium.com/bits-and-behavior/mindstorms-what-did-papert-argue-and-what-does-it-mean-for-learning-and-education-c8324b58aca4

#mathematics #programming #Logo #TurtleGraphics #ITeachMath #MathematicsEducation #MathEd #MathsEd #SeymourPapert #Mindstorms

Mindstorms: what did Papert argue and what does it mean for learning and education?

I turned 37 years old today. People like to point out that I don’t really look my age, and so I leverage this to act younger and feel…

Medium

@leon_p_smith
‘Mindstorms’ is full of quotable text, here’s just one:

“Imagine that children were forced to spend an hour a day drawing dance steps on squared paper and had to pass tests in these ‘dance facts’ before they were allowed to dance physically. Would we not expect the world to be full of ‘dancophobes’?Would we say that those who made it to the dance floor and music had the greatest ‘aptitude for dance’? In my view, it is no more appropriate to draw conclusions about mathematical aptitude from children’s unwillingness to spend many hundreds of hours doing sums.” — Seymour Papert (p. 43)

#mathematics #ITeachMath #MathematicsEducation #MathEd #MathsEd #SeymourPapert #Mindstorms

@leon_p_smith
A puzzle from Seymour Papert's Mindstorms:

"A monkey and a rock are attached to opposite ends of a rope that is hung over a pulley. The monkey and the rock are of equal weight and balance one another. The monkey begins to climb the rope. What happens to the rock?"

What is your reasoning and what were your assumptions? If you know the answer, what was your first answer?

#puzzle #MathEd #MathsEd #iTeachMath #physics #mechanics

The rock goes up.
64.7%
The rock goes stays at the same position.
29.4%
The rock goes down.
5.9%
Poll ended at .

@foldworks @leon_p_smith

The way I see it the relative heights of the monkey and rock don't matter as regardless of their position, they apply the same force. If the monkey climbs a foot of its rope, it is applying tension on the rope and with a frictionless bearing the rock and monkey will both rise half a foot as they have the same inertia so the force will affect each equally.

@The4thCircle @leon_p_smith
How could you persuade someone else that the fulcrum/beam model isn't relevant/suitable?

@foldworks @leon_p_smith

I'm not sure. I guess its to do with the angles of the force relevant to the angle of the beam, with the upper load pulling toward the fulcrum whereas the lower load pulls away and therefore has less angular momentum force on the beam itself.

Whereas the pulley model they both pull straight down at all times.