herseycokguzelolacakAlmost 100,000 young men flee Ukraine in two months
So what happens when Ukraine loses? Are we at war with Russia then?
Cowbee [he/they]NATO can’t field an actual war against Russia, NATO countries don’t have the industrial capacity to do so. NATO has big scary tools, but not many of them, and in a protracted war where the industrial power wins Russia would win out. It would be very bloody, long, and NATO would lose, so it’s unlikely that there will be all-out war.
DiplomjodlerRussia has had its ass kicked with western hand-me-downs. Once they roll out the real kit, the whole thing will be over within days.
Russia is winning now, and hasn’t fielded the “real kit” either. NATO just does not have the productive capacity to field a long term war. I’m not sure why warmongers like yourself keep thinking there’s going to be a grand turning point, in a decade when we look back on this event I fear the warmongers will say they knew the outcome all along.
Because it can’t win a short-term war unless it goes nuclear, and then everyone loses.
Because it doesn’t have the power to take down an industrialized nuclear power like Russia in a short term war. I don’t see what you’re imagining here.
Because western countries do not have the industrial capacity for a long-term war nor the ability to topple a country as large as Russia in the short term.
You are a master at dodging the question, I’ll give you that!
I never dodged anything. No power on the planet has the ability to overtake a country as large as Russia, a nuclear-armed Russia at that, in a short-term war. Invading Russia is notoriously difficult, and the neighboring countries with land bridges do not have the ability to field a large offensive, except China, which is an ally.