and at the end of this, we're left with the question: "is she irredeemable?"
here's the thing: we do not believe she is irredeemable! but we also do not see her doing any of the work she would need to do to have a meaningful redemption arc. instead, every time she's given the opportunity, she rejects it and doubles down!
@atax1a definitely my mistake, also I'm just plain wrong on re-read because "irredemable" is about potential not prediction, so very specifically, "if they had an epiphany and started doing the work to fix things tomorrow, would it still be too late?".
I'm snappy about shitty people being given never ending chances.
@itsmaya @atax1a I mean, she *could*! I want to extend a lot of charity to these kinds of people because I grew up in a Mormon family and considered myself a "conservative" for a while when I was 12! But the reality is that there's no sign she's going to, and there's no point giving her credit for it before she does.
This probably sounds argumentative because a lot of stuff I say sounds like that so what I mean to say is I agree with you and I'm sick of people falling for Laurelai's shit.
she has expressed no remorse and done no atonement and performed actively negative amounts of accountability towards her victims
we are in fact one of her victims, we speak authoritatively on this matter
@atax1a it baffles me that people are using HAL and disposability culture to defend LB rather than LB's numerous victims, most of whom are transfems.
like, this should be the easiest fucking thing in the world. LB isn't a victim. victims don't periodically show up in communities under pseudonyms and try to install themselves into positions of power over others. victims don't run a literal religious abuse cult with themselves at the center of it.
it's so fucking disappointing.