There was a brief period of time when upgrade modules for computers looked like upgrade modules for computers.
@nina_kali_nina We all just wanted Sony cyberdeck aesthetics without the Sony made-up-a-proprietary-lock-in-and-nobody-cared formats and protocols.
Sony Vaio P11Z – Wikipedia

@kkarhan @nina_kali_nina https://www.msx.org/wiki/Sony_HB-10 ← This was more what I was going for, or maybe the HB-F1...
Sony HB-10 - MSX Wiki

This machine was aimed at the Japanese market - see HB-10 series for the technical details. It was first shown to the public at the Japan Electronics Show '85 (Oct 17-22).

@kkarhan @nina_kali_nina Heck, even the standard 3½" diskette or the minidisc are design classics compared to what we all ended up with.

@spacehobo @nina_kali_nina I still think the 3,5" FDD has the supreme handling of any removeable media, which is why I advocate to copy it's design for hot-swappable SSDs

  • Simply because it's just a superior design!

Tho granted if it were to help I'd accept increasing THICC-ness from 3,3mm to 5mm since that could increase mechanical stiffness and prevent idiots.from shoving it into a real 3,5" FDD drive…

  • Certainly it's better than USB flashdrives and (often precariously dangling) external SSDs.
The genius engineering of the 3½ inch floppy disk

YouTube
@kkarhan @spacehobo @nina_kali_nina they call it cf or sd :)
@eckes @spacehobo @nina_kali_nina Except both formats struggle with cooling at high loads in high performance applications and are quite flimsy and fragile!
@kkarhan @spacehobo @nina_kali_nina yeah i guess if you need that, then it’s E.3-S or other sizes from EDSFF (or U.2/3 for older, there are some without caddy)

@eckes @spacehobo @nina_kali_nina They do work great for servers, but only doing PCIe makes them quite expensive to support.

  • Which is why I wish for SD, USB, SATA & PCIe as interfaces, given that:
  • SD works with any SBC and many embedded devices as boot drive,
  • SATA does the same for Desktop,
  • USB is trading convenience and compatibility for that and
  • PCIe is focussed on speed.

https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/115284064808107600

Kevin Karhan :verified: (@[email protected])

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] granted I am aware of [CFexpress](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFexpress#Form_factors) and whilst #PCIe / #NVMe provides excellent performance, I'm confident it would be best to offer a [*"Quad-Mode"* storage solution](https://github.com/KBtechnologies/NeoFloppy/blob/main/documentation/neofloppy.specification.md#pinout) that offers #USB, #SD, #SATA & #PCIe to serve all the needs from low-power SBCs to bootable drives to high-performance storage. - Not to mention the benefits of a [bigger surface area](https://github.com/KBtechnologies/NeoFloppy/blob/main/documentation/neofloppy.specification.md#mechanical-dimensions) medium with space for labelling, NFC/RFID tags (similar to [MAM](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Auxiliary_Memory) on Tapes) and barcode at the rear for ease of [media identification](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Tape-Open#Labels) as well as automated media handling in [Autoloaders](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tape_library#Autoloaders) and espechally given the shortcomings of #Tape and #HDD|s that are way less capable to expand with growing needs, as [speed doesn't increase with capacity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Tape-Open#Tape_specifications)... The idea is closer to making a universal yet affordable standard for removeable media.

Infosec.Space
@kkarhan @spacehobo @nina_kali_nina u.3 Supports Sata and sas as well, but since you care for performance I guess NVMe or CXL will be better

@eckes @spacehobo @nina_kali_nina granted CXL will likely never come to Consumer Devices and PCIe whilst being fast will really make things expensive.

  • Obviously the drives would more or less transparently choose the best interface based off the available connectivity support of the media and host (with the option to hard-set them)…

@kkarhan @eckes @spacehobo @nina_kali_nina

AMD has talked about bringing CXL to Consumer platforms for a while, and there are a couple of TRX50 boards that unofficially support it today. Still HEDT but not far from consumer.

@krutonium @eckes @spacehobo @nina_kali_nina granted I don't consider #Threadripper a "consumer platform" but rather #Enterprise / #Enthusiast / #Workstation-grade.

  • Just because someone is willing to sell to me as a consumer doesn't mean that's cinsumer grade...

Still, #CXL's ability to offer basically "#SlowRAM" expansion is nifty and will make #Database applications and #caching significantly faster whilst reducing wear on regular #SSD|s in high-#IOPS scenarios...

@kkarhan @eckes @spacehobo @nina_kali_nina Even if it is "slow" ram, it's still faster than older standards like DDR2/3 - Honestly most scenarios don't need more.

My big want for CXL Ram on a Card would be to attach an 18650 to it and use it as my root filesystem/boot drive.

(And this is just steps to get it closer to consumer viable)