Today, we’re ready to show you the upcoming quote posts feature in more detail. We’ve put together a blog post with examples of how quote posts will work on Mastodon, ahead of early access on our own servers next week 💬 Full launch to come, in Mastodon v4.5

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2025/09/introducing-quote-posts/

Introducing quote posts

Over the years, we’ve learned just how essential quoting is to many of you. Here's a deep dive on how quote posts will work on Mastodon.

Mastodon Blog

We’ve thought carefully about building this feature, and we hope it broadens your use of Mastodon!

However, you're in control: if you don’t want your content to be quoted, you can find the setting to prevent future quotes of your content under Settings -> Preferences -> Other (in Mastodon 4.4).

There’s documentation available today, along with an FAQ. If you’re a developer, draft documentation is available as well.

Quote posting will be available on mastodon.online and mastodon.social next week! We will be listening to your feedback on our new feature.

https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/quote-posts/

Quoting other posts - Mastodon documentation

All about quoting content (your own posts, or those made by other people).

@Mastodon is there a plan to have similar control over replies ? The quote post controls seem pretty handy. It would be very useful to limit replies to followers or no one
@dev @Mastodon you can already do that by limiting visibility to followers.
@kolya @Mastodon sure, but it is a different use case to express something publicly that you don’t want strangers (or anyone) replying to
@dev @Mastodon if you want unidirectional communication, you have a lot of options. but that's not what a social network is for. it's not social.
@kolya @Mastodon I’m not sure if you’ve used other social networks like twitter or bluesky, both of them have the feature and it is widely used.
@dev @kolya @Mastodon Genuinely curious as to what other use cases are there besides "expressing something publicly", and whether or not they're acknowledged on Twitter/X or Bluesky. Because it's also very much well known for promoting scandalous content without getting into trouble.

@duc @kolya @Mastodon I would simply like anything that I post which gets some traction filled with replies “well actually” or explaining my post to me. Or filling the replies with more unrelated misery about something bad that happened to me. Or having arguments.

The issue is never regular posts. It is important sometimes to indicate to people outside my circle that they don’t need to weigh in on something or I’m not asking for advice.

@dev @kolya @Mastodon I see.

re: plans, in the technical sense, this needs to be implemented at the ActivityPub protocol level first, and while the contributors and maintainers agreed to the idea of reply controls, there are still some roadblocks on how it should be implemented.

FEP-5624: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-5624-per-object-reply-control-policies/2723

FEP-5624: Per-object reply control policies

source: Showing its internal error page. --- authors: @Claire status: DRAFT dateReceived: 2022-08-23 --- FEP-5624: Per-object reply control policies Summary Sometimes, users may want to share an information or a story without inviting replies from outside their circles or from anyone at all. In particular, individuals may want to restrict who can reply to them in order to avoid “reply guys” or limit outright harassment, while instutions may want to disable replies on their posts to provid...

SocialHub
Withdraw FEP-5624

This FEP has seen no updates for the last 2 years.

Codeberg.org
@teohhanhui @dev @Mastodon It got stalled, but there are new proposals based on FEP-5624, like FEP-7888, FEP-7458 and FEP-0391. You should check them out near the end of FEP-5624's discussion.