Still can't figure out what makes the Air's “A19 Pro" different from the 17's “A19”.
The 17 Pro's chip has a 6th GPU core, so that one makes sense. (A little.)
Oh, I think I got it.
When talking about the A19 Pro's “50% more cache” for the CPU cores, they said A19 Pro is “even faster and more efficient than A19”.
So:
17: less cache
17 and Air: more cache, 5 GPU cores
17 Pro: more cache, 6 GPU cores
I wonder if they maybe clocked them differently, too.
@marcoarment My guess is it gets fewer of the low-level bumps that the Pro chip gets? So, less cache per core, maybe fewer ML-accelerating features in the GPU cores?
EDIT: Oh no, I guess they call out the ML stuff specifically for all. Can't read.
@Reemt @jonathantrott Radio chips have all sorts of analog components in addition to their digital computation. I bet there are good reasons.
Cellular modems are also REALLY complicated and relatively large, so maybe it made sense to fab the C-series on a more expensive leading node than the probably-much-simpler N-series.