@n_dimension @privacyguides
I speak from the perspective of an active opponent of a repressive regime, that of neo-Nazi Donald Trump and his MAGA meatheads. To me, any cracks in the security of encryption would let in what I consider enemy spies.
The true purpose of all control of communications anywhere is an attempt to give governments an advantage over the people, expecially political opponents. This has nothing whatsoever to do with "save the children" and everything to do with putting anti-Fascist, anti-fossil fuel/pro climate, and pro-Palestine activists in prison.
NO QUARTER for chat control, key disclosure, "lawful intercept" whatever they want to call it. None asked, none given. Just utter, absolute refusal to use any compliant device for any purpose. Whatever it takes, and no half measures.
Even if they took down the entire Internet and replaced it with say "ShopperNet" usable only for approved purposes, ANY kind of media can still be distributed person to person on flash drives.
They want to ban this too? It will take over 20 years for the supply of noncompliant computers and storage devices to die of electromigration. By that time none of the politicians pushing such a law will still be in office to reap the alleged benefits.
Any device in my possession with Chat Control's potential US equivalent baked in would go straight into the trash, after being smashed with a hammer of course to prevent data recovery. Of course Google would have a hard time pushing it to a phone not running Google Play Services with Google itself blocked at the device level.
I oppose their OBJECTIVES with Chat Control, not just their methods