@arstechnica “Oh, no! Anyway…”

https://tenor.com/brYN5.gif

@arstechnica While the cited advocacy groups’ concerns are valid—that this isn’t really a proper settlement for the actual owners of stolen works—Anthropic’s anemic response is predictable. There is no attempt at justifying the act of thievery; rather, all their words boil down to is, “You should just let this slide because AI is too important* for the tech industry’s future.”

*Citation fucking needed.

@arstechnica Please don't let the authors settle. A settlement would let the defendant keep operating and just pay some large-but-survivable penalty.

Don't stop until you've ruined them and destroyed every cent of assets they have and have a court order demanding that the models be destroyed as infringing articles with no lawful function.

@arstechnica

GOOOD!

@arstechnica DO IT

RUIN THEM

@arstechnica

Given the insane hardware and operating costs of LLMs and the lack of a revenue model that can match them, that's like saying a cloud of starlings poses a risk to the people who jumped from the airplane with no parachute.

@arstechnica

LFG!

@arstechnica

Copyright class actions could financially ruin AI industry, trade groups say.

@arstechnica

😂👍

@arstechnica

Look, just because they committed the largest copyright theft in history, is that any reason for them to face the largest copyright lawsuit in history?

Yes. Yes, it is.

@arstechnica

Good.

Also, nice LLM-written article. Reads like a shitty fanfic.

@arstechnica

So they’re arguing that no one can properly identify the owners of the stuff they stole, so they shouldn’t pay damages for benefiting from the theft?

#AI #genAI #oligarchs