I read this article today and quite liked it

https://www.drewlyton.com/story/the-future-is-not-self-hosted/

An analogy came to mind when reading it: if the cloud is feudalism, self hosted is sustenance farming.

Sustenance farming… Well, it sucks, it’s brutal, it’s awful. No wonder people want centralized infrastructure! Groceries aren’t a concept in sustenance farming, neither is something like “food sensitivities”—you just die or accept the feudalism because you have no other choice.

Some people happen to like sustenance farming and the idea of living fully off the grid! But they’re not normal. That’s fine, but it’s not workable for most people and carries an enormous amount of unstated privilege. For example: the person in the article casually buying a server and dropping a few thousand dollars on it, setting up several complicated systems in it, and “only” spending a few weeks of free time doing so? Privileged. Fun hobby if you like that, though!

The bad part, in my opinion, is that our only choices are currently techno fascism… Or the sustenance farming that killed almost everyone who attempted it. That’s not a great set of choices and it doesn’t have to be like that.

I liked the reference to community clouds in the ending of the article. It reminded me very much of Common Pool Resources that Elinor Ostrom talks about, or the emergent strategy of adrienne marie brown. I need to read more Ursula Franklin, but I suspect her writing is right at home here too.

I’d like to live in a world where communities uplift and support each other and are able to do so. I’m doing my best to help make that a reality, even if I’ve had to spend the last year or two putting my own mask on first :)

The Future is NOT Self-Hosted

In a world where corporations have detached buying from owning, one man attempts to do something radical: build his own cloud.

Drew Lyton

@hazelweakly we're really missing a technology/protocol layer that would enable communities and organizations to pool resources together into a solid, usable, understandable, scalable experience for messaging/sharing/collaboration/storage/organization/etc. – p2p-ish but not completely flat; designed around articulated trust rather than libertarian zero-trust ideas.

I wrote a bit in this lobsters comment but I probably need to expand it into a proper article or something…

A Dive Into Open Chat Protocols | Lobsters

@valpackett @hazelweakly it was hoped that #pgp/ #gpg would allow the development of 'Webs of Trust' which could be a key building block for this idea, but so far no one has built a user interface which would make that accessible to most people.

That UI is a hard problem to solve well, but some mashup between #ActivityPub and a web of trust -- a #Mastodon-like system where all posts are encrypted but all posts by people who trusted you are decryptable -- is possible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_trust

Web of trust - Wikipedia

@simon_brooke @valpackett @hazelweakly
The data space protocol based developments go into a very similar direction (a unified control plane on top of a random data plane).

If *data spaces* keep developing independently from Microsoft/SAP/etc..., we will probably see a authentication schema based on several trust anchors (true DID), and a distributed/interoperable network of various other components.