Stap 1 in project “overstappen van IPhone naar Fairphone met /e/OS” is gezet. Ik heb net via Marktplaats een FP4 gekocht.

Daar ga ik dan zelf /e/OS op installeren (hopelijk lukt dat) en die telefoon eerst naast m’n IPhone gebruiken om alles stap voor stap in een rustig tempo te doen.

Ik zal aantekeningen maken als jullie voor me duimen 💛 (best spannend)

#eos #fairphone #bigtech

@sandradejong leuk project, maar je had eigenlijk voor #grpaheneos moeten kiezen. En dus een Pixel toestel via Marktplaats moet kopen. iOS waar je nu op zit is veiliger dan /e/OS. Waarom? Zie hier: https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm
Comparison of Android-based Operating Systems

Comparison of Android-based Operating Systems

@richarddebruin @sandradejong
#GrapheneOS is safer, but it's also less #userFriendly than #eOS, AFAIK. Plus #eOS looks a little more like #iOS.
@ThePfromtheO @richarddebruin @sandradejong GrapheneOS is very user-friendly. If you need to turn on Google Play Services, it is easily done by just pressing the install button on the built-in app store provided by Graphene.
@gkcan @richarddebruin @sandradejong
OK, but why did people say it's not, then?
@ThePfromtheO @gkcan @richarddebruin @sandradejong Groups who feel threatened by GrapheneOS misinform people about it to justify why people should use an OS unable to keep up with basic privacy/security patches, not providing driver/firmware security patches and not keep basic parts of the privacy/security model intact. The vast majority of tech media sites publish poorly researched and AI generated articles. They're not trying GrapheneOS but rather describing it based on what others say.

@GrapheneOS @gkcan @richarddebruin @sandradejong
“They're not trying GrapheneOS but rather describing it based on what others say.”

I understand this, but #GrapheneOS's homepage is also a factor that influences their opinions, as I said here:
https://social.vivaldi.net/@ThePfromtheO/114823736413376203

Also this: https://mastodon.nl/@sandradejong/114823623342107933

ThePfromtheO (@[email protected])

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] What I don't understand is that considering the amount of popularity and sponsorship #GrapheneOS is getting, why didn't it put a little effort into making its website more welcoming? Especially for visitors, who might be potential new users and finally supporters.

Vivaldi Social
@ThePfromtheO @gkcan @richarddebruin @sandradejong We plan to include videos and more images on our website but the project is focused on substance, not marketing. It has the same aesthetics as Android 16 within the OS. We keep the default system color scheme, background, etc. very minimal. Our default background is a pure black background instead of an advertisement for GrapheneOS. Boot animation is minimal. We put our effort into privacy, security, compatibility, usability and robustness.
@GrapheneOS @gkcan @richarddebruin @sandradejong
“ the project is focused on substance, not marketing”
It is, but IMO it shouldn't be so in a such high degree that it won't even include a few screenshots of the interface. When I went to the homepage (and this was certainly before hearing any comment on its user-friendliness etc.!) I considered it was either too technical, or too much focused on security and privacy to be interested in its appeal to visitors.

@ThePfromtheO @gkcan @richarddebruin @sandradejong Our focus on user friendliness is currently overhauling the appearance and functionality of the legacy AOSP apps or replacing them with forks of better apps. This takes us much more time than others because of our standards for robustness, privacy and security. We care about doing things correctly.

Since the OS is just meant to look like standard Android 16 with a very minimal base install, we only want screenshots/videos to show our features.

@GrapheneOS @gkcan @richarddebruin @sandradejong
I only speak about a few screenshots featuring the operating system. #eOS doesn't have many either, just two with the home screen, a few featuring the messages, calendar, and maps apps (one photo for each), and a few with the app store and the settings app. The rest is not needed.
@ThePfromtheO @gkcan @richarddebruin @sandradejong GrapheneOS user interface is the unmodified Android 16 UI beyond configuring it similarly to the stock Pixel OS and other devices such as enabling rounded icons, rounded corners, etc. Our default homescreen is simply a black background. Our system app icons just use black on white. It's a very minimal base install. Third party apps and services are left up to users. We aren't trying to provide a fancy default homescreen, etc.
@ThePfromtheO @gkcan @richarddebruin @sandradejong We plan to add videos to show using features like Contact Scopes, Storage Scopes, etc. as part of our usage guide. We could make a form of combined video for the home page showing various GrapheneOS features, but as we said it's very hard to keep that up-to-date and make changes to it. It would need to be many small clips edited together and regularly redone as things change. Our focus is improving the OS rather than that kind of marketing.

@GrapheneOS The definition of marketing does not need to be "sell things to people regardless if they want it or not". The definition of marketing (or communication) should be "welcoming people who are looking for you - so they can recognise you".

/1

@ThePfromtheO