@Natasha_Jay The main AI application is sycophancy.
Since about 80% of jobs in North America involve countless hours of kissing up to the boss, it is clearly possible to achieve cost savings by locking up thin skinned neurotics in a room with a machine that strokes their egos non-stop.
Why else do you think they find "in person" work so essential?
8) Sandra, Bill, and Jane then all went and voted to remove the leeches on the system and create space for those with merit. Like themselves. Heil.
Yeah, sadly the conclusion is "business value" is an illusion in most knowledge work.
@Natasha_Jay AI IS NOT THE WAY!
Do👏not👏listen👏to👏techbros👏
AI adds negative Business value in such cases as persons who are paid to work do not produce, just create expensive useless rubbish. Good management would read the crap understand the uselessness and dismiss the non creators on the spot.
the age old problem of confusing activity with progress
"Jesus is coming. Look busy." -- a bumper sticker I saw once
I vaguely recall a joke along those lines.
Something about two guys who are ship wrecked on a remote island, with nothing but a hat. To pass the time, they trade the hat back and forth. When they are finally rescued, both are millionaires...
IIRC H. Beam Piper told a variation of that joke in his novel Space Viking.
Yes, that was my point. Using AI to write, read, and interpret business reports is the new becoming billionaires by trading rocks.
My thoughts exactly. David Graeber would point out they were doing the same before AI.
Have you ever heard Sam Altman speak? I’m serious, have you ever heard this man say words from his mouth? Here is but one of the trenchant insights from Sam Altman in his agonizing 37-minute-long podcast conversation with his brother Jack Altman from last week: “I think there will
One point is missing. The important one. No one will feel or be made responsible for whatever will happen based on this workflow.
The last couple sentences are doing a lot of heavy lifting in that post.
Let me run that past the AI to see if it checks out...
@Natasha_Jay 8) the colleague who knows what it is about reads it and there's at least one mistake
like here
IA et fausse information : comment je me suis bagarré avec Gemini - Next
https://next.ink/190383/comment-je-me-suis-bagarre-avec-gemini/
Je me suis battu récemment avec Gemini pour lui faire admettre une erreur. Utilisé en renfort de la rédaction d’une actualité, l’assistant de Google m’a assuré qu’une information existait, preuve à l’appui. Mais ni l’information ni la preuve n’étaient réelles. Le 20 juin, j’ai publié un article à l’occasion de l’entrée en application de deux […]
@Natasha_Jay This is why "AI" will replace middle-management…
@Natasha_Jay But did the report ever actually need to be written? 'Cause if it wasn't, then AI is the symptom, not the root, of the problem.
Because nobody was reading, understanding, evaluating, or acting on the report to begin with. They just had to try harder to pretend to.
Oh heck; that's not a new problem!
In the late 1980s, our team was pressured to implement some "vitally important functionality" report that some person was spending FULL TIME producing. We were being forced to, so we went to every person who received the report, to determine their real business needs.
NOT A SINGLE PERSON EVER USED THE REPORT!
Not at all. Not once. Not ever.
It was 100% filed, ignored, and then later discarded.
100% USELESS WASTE.
@Natasha_Jay @JeffGrigg Doesn't surprise me. A few years ago, I read a book titled Bullshit Jobs by an anthropologist who found, during a freak survey, that anywhere from thirty to forty percent of all people held jobs they honestly believed contributed nothing to society. A lot of these are professional-managerial positions that produce exactly those kinds of reports, and exist mostly to make upper management feel important.
I've had family members tell me they felt like they spent more time filling out paperwork about their work than actually working, that they felt useless when promoted to management because the team already knew what they were doing, and a friend of mine who went on to read the book claimed it explained so much of what went on at his tech workplace.
The book, "Bullshit Jobs: A Theory"
by David Graeber
https://www.amazon.com/Bullshit-Jobs-Theory-David-Graeber-ebook/dp/B075RWG7YM/
@Natasha_Jay @JeffGrigg That's the one!
Sounds like you might've read it already.
Sorry; I have not read the "Bullshit Jobs" book. Seems too depressing. 😢
Natasha Jay
RRB
Itoshi no FoxyDonuts 🏳️⚧️
Hot Dog Water Moccasin
Falling forward 🌵
Will Berard 🫳🎤🫶
mikeTesteLinuxQlub
Branch Predictor 
Human 3500
CaptainMalu
kolya
muggebatscher
felis_catus_domesticus
Dopes The Frogman
RozNonofurbsns
Lime Bar
Levka
Sterling
crazyeddie
Ian
Winchell Chung ⚛🚀
Patrick Morris Miller
Amro has been
ranmatoranma
Nini
Atrapado🌴🍫
echo ex machina
mage_of_dragons
Earthshine
Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦
WEBmadman
Erwan 🚄
^[[200~Michael
fotoFi
GockLeak タマネギ
Ryek Darkener
Raymond Russell
Wulfy
ENIGMATICO 
Dimly Lit Corners
⛩️稲荷大神の狐⛩️ 
Jo with elbows up & chin up
David Nash
Pxl Phile
Kid Mania
Jeff Grigg
Carl O.S. ©
Peter Brown