Martin TaibrIf an LLM and its output are based on 10^12 hours of work, out of which 10^6 is working on the code of the LLM itself and 10^12-10^6 (so roughly still 10^12) is working on the training data, does it make sense for only those working on the 10^6 to be compensated for the work?
OS-SCI@os_sci Which is not even close to what they owe us. They should subsist on a millionth of their income because the rest belongs to the people whose data was stolen.
Which is ironic because the economic output of actual AI would probably be enough for that... a glorified text predictor, though, is another matter.