For those playing along at home, just an observation that as of today:
breachforums[.]info
has spun up as new on DDoS-Guard, registered through Nicenic yesterday.
For those playing along at home, just an observation that as of today:
breachforums[.]info
has spun up as new on DDoS-Guard, registered through Nicenic yesterday.
Also, seeing dozens and dozens of garbage .top domains being spun up on pananames[.]com nameservers, registered through URL Solutions (same company as pananames), and then transferred into storm-pro[.]net. Started Monday 2025-06-24.
@mttaggart @badsamurai @neurovagrant @jwgoerlich I CANT DO THIS AND IT ENRAGES ME
We have several clients in the biotech space that use .xyz
I'm not fucking kidding.
@mttaggart @SecurityWriter @NosirrahSec @badsamurai @jwgoerlich what're you, a cop?
🤨
@mttaggart @neurovagrant @NosirrahSec @badsamurai @jwgoerlich like homoglyph domains orrr…?
Usually no, there’s too many possible whack-a-moles for us to make that viable
@Viss @SecurityWriter @mttaggart @NosirrahSec @badsamurai @jwgoerlich also fwiw i have bought a few sus domains ;)
if i can't take inspiration from my work for other creative endeavours, why stay there?
(i work for DomainTools, who do a lot of domain/DNS threat intel stuff)
@mei @NosirrahSec @SecurityWriter @badsamurai @catsalad @jwgoerlich @mttaggart @Viss I'd encourage every legit xyz site you know of to migrate off.
It's a bad neighborhood, and it brings users to a bad neighborhood.
@neurovagrant @mei @SecurityWriter @badsamurai @catsalad @jwgoerlich @mttaggart @Viss exactly.
The whole TLD is tainted. Any legitimate site in it, or service, is a rare exception compared to the bulk.
@mei @NosirrahSec @SecurityWriter @badsamurai @catsalad @jwgoerlich @mttaggart @neurovagrant
from what i can tell its two things:
1) the domains are cheap, so they can be bought in bulk
2) most of the people buying bulk domains are malware threat actors or spammers
so those TLDs very quickly get a reputation for being "mostly bad"
Study shows reactive takedowns have little impact on deterring phishing. An ICANN-funded study has identified which registrar practices are most associated with phishing-related domain name abuse. Unsurprisingly, registration cost is one of the top factors associated with maliciously registered domain names. The research, known as INFERMAL (Inferential Analysis of Maliciously Registered Domains), was conducted by […]
@mei @NosirrahSec @badsamurai @catsalad @jwgoerlich @mttaggart @neurovagrant @Viss that is, objectively and statistically a very insignificant amount. And nobody is going to use them in 99.9999% of use cases.
Block them, and let the legitimate owners do the math. Not my problem.
lemmy.zip is a fairly popular lemmy (fediverse reddit) server.
Fedi, atproto, and personal sites are the only legit sites that use those domains.
I've never seen a legit .pro or .top though.
@mttaggart @SecurityWriter @NosirrahSec @badsamurai @jwgoerlich I think practice has moved more to monitoring for active lookalikes and smushing them as possible.
(but given my employer, that's very Company Guy of me)
@mttaggart @SecurityWriter @NosirrahSec @badsamurai @jwgoerlich i love prophylactic registration, but it gets expensive fast.
Typically if we're doing a thing we'll do a handful of preventative registrations on the top 6-10 TLDs.
@badsamurai you guys block it for the Enterprise network?
That's interesting. I wonder why it's not in the top 10 malicious TLDs of Spamhaus:
https://www.spamhaus.org/reputation-statistics/cctlds/domains/
I'm going to give a try to see if my employer also blocks it. I only know that they block the whole .app
TLD...