mejum
Michael PusateriThere's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.
- Admiral William Adama
Tyler Vulol - the police has been the military while you weren’t looking.
Dibs
potpie@dtwx @tylervu @cruftbox I think it's a coping mechanism. I cringe at it whenever the first reply to a terrible news headline is WhY iS aNyOnE sUrPrIsEd? as though anyone were actually surprised, or as though 'surprise' is the point of news stories.
It's a coping mechanism, but you don't need it. Instead get out there, make a sign, chant with others, talk to people.
gim
rexi
tessarakt@cruftbox Also, the term "law enforcement" is completely inappropriate. Policing typically should be by consent, not by enforcement.
Pass the Dutchie@tessarakt @cruftbox
I was thinking, police don't serve and protect us, they serve and protect Capital.
I was thinking, police don't serve and protect us, they serve and protect Capital.
Ammadien@cruftbox there’s also a reason you abolish both th military and police - they’re fascist institutions from the jump.
Minna Antikainen@cruftbox So say we all
FreediverX@cruftbox
The police have never protected the people. They protect capital and property.
The police have never protected the people. They protect capital and property.