He didn't know what he wasn't doing because knowing what he should have been doing made him think he knew what he was doing.
Why you would start a project with possibly error-riddled initial state and then iterate with possibly error-riddled improvements I don't know.
@SorceryForEva @s0 @gsuberland @hailey that's been my biggest objection to using AI as a coding agent for quite a while now.
Personally, I find writing my own code easier and less stressful than debugging others' code.
Similarly, I'd MUCH rather drive my own (sigh) Tesla than "supervise" the idiot Autopilot driving my (sigh) Tesla.
@brezelradar
Indeed, though in this case, “you just” is a joke; it very much cannot solve the problem. The post is satire of people who think that tests guarantee code correctness.
It’s analogous to saying you can make a turtle fly by putting it on the back of another turtle that can already fly. “And how does •that• turtle fly?” “It’s turtles all the way down!”
@inthehands I see. 😀👍
My irony/satire/sarcasm detector is kinda on the fritz since around 2019 when all those lunatics went totally bonkers.
> It’s analogous to saying you can make a turtle fly by putting it on the back of another turtle that can already fly. “And how does •that• turtle fly?” “It’s turtles all the way down!”
That's how recursion works, right? Or was it induction 🤔
@unsaturated @hailey The part that is slightly surprising is that this happened despite the claim that "I was trying to validate my skepticism".
It's not like the red team gets a magic bonus to competence; but wanting to find fault should, at least, make you less likely to be misled by something looking pretty competent overall; where someone who is basically skimming to see if the new guy is a loser or not would be more likely to see that it's basically workmanlike and relax.
@hailey sauces: https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-oauth-provider?tab=readme-ov-file#written-using-claude
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2025-4143
alternatively, here's an even less accessible version
@hailey
and what an odd way to deflect. this developer knows that criticism will first go to the fact that they used AI (because, of course) so they get out in front of it by saying "its not the AI's fault! its all me! im the stupid one!"
its all becoming very ideological, this AI coding stuff. you can see the more fervent defenders doing goofy stuff like this and sacrificing themselves for the AI models they use. its all very odd to me. why not just have fun coding?
@hailey Yes. That's what I keep saying at work. If it can be used wrong, it will.
Even if you tell people how to use it right, at best they'll do it for a while and then use it wrong. And even if they think they're using it right, eventually they'll use it wrong.
That's what I hate most I think. It's insidious and misleading as fuck, and it keeps tricking otherwise perfectly sensible and intelligent people into courses of action they would never have followed otherwise.
(The last phrase is probably a big selling point for the truly evil actors.)
If only someone... ANYONE... had warned that "lazy coding" would (also) lead to "fucking shit up" because you lose familiarity with "the basic concepts of 'how the thing is supposed to work'" when you're no longer 'doing it for yourself'
I think Reddit is going to need some sort of "EloiFacesEatenByMorlocks" subreddit for this in the near future