Including fake studies and using AI to generate a report should instantly disqualify anyone to lead a scientific agency.

@luckytran Do you have anyone in mind? I use AI to generate reports often. I just did...

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15555539

The #fake studies thing is problematic but that's a #human #editor not #fact checking.

Autaxys Research & Development Master Plan

Autaxys Research & Development Master Plan (v1.0 Draft - Approved for Save)

Zenodo
@QNFO @luckytran .. yay for telling on yourself, I guess? 🤷
@dalias @luckytran since I do not know what prompted the OP, I wish not to take sides in someone else's issue. Reckless or fraudulent behavior is clearly unacceptable. But what I suspect is the case is one of #AI #hallucination and #human carelessness: like the "AI lawyer" who didn't bother to check that the cases #ChatGPT spit out were real.
@dalias @luckytran ...if so, then my soapbox is one of growing pains: #AI #language models are becoming indispensable, like it or not. If the report at issue endangered lives or was a deliberate lie, so be it. Otherwise, we would do well to better #understand how an #LLM works to avoid such mistakes as writers and judge those we find more as typos than #plagiarism.
@QNFO @luckytran @dalias > ...if so, then my soapbox is one of growing pains: #AI #language models are becoming indispensable, like it or not.

How have they done so? You seem to still be capable of writing.
@lispi314
We're still capable of laziness.
@PatrickOBeirne Not bothering to do one's work properly without fraudulent behavior & scholarly misconduct is a rather strong argument for not doing it at all. It'll do less harm.