I don’t understand how not doing this is even an option, assuming trucks follow classical physics.
Or maybe that is the problem and the sign was too small for “trucks - despite the name, please don’t quantum tunnel through the tunnel”.
I don’t understand how not doing this is even an option, assuming trucks follow classical physics.
Or maybe that is the problem and the sign was too small for “trucks - despite the name, please don’t quantum tunnel through the tunnel”.
Can opener bridges, tunnels, are a thing. Some can opener (low clearance) bridges are even close to truck depots where they take out dozens of trailers a year. (Google!)
One thing the clearance signs don’t account for if the driver has done due diligence of reading signs and knowing the height of their load (on flat ground- they are entering the underpass at an angle. The height of the REAR of their trailer 53 feet back exceeds the clearance and gets shaved off as they enter.
Strong vibes of:
"Longships, kindly alter your course."
"No, suggest you alter course."
"No! We are a US Navy warship. You alter course!"
"Suit yourself. We are a lighthouse."
@standupmaths Eh, seems perfectly reasonable to me. It means "truck drivers, please remember that your vehicle might not fit in the tunnel and don't try to drive into it unless you know it will fit".
Given the existence of the sign, I assume there's some history of truck drivers failing to do this. How else should they remind them in the space available?
@standupmaths You have clearly never watched videos from this channel:
"Obey" in this sense is the legal definition rather per the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) than the Laws Of Motion (1687).
The laws of classical physics will still hold but with a very messy inelastic collision.
Aside:
The big grey thing not far away from where you are, is a Catenary; so your hunt for Parabolas will have to continue.