I'm just reading about people being addicted and thinking the thing is sentient and some sort of metaphysical being.
Altman's reaction is "oops, our model is a bit to sycophantic, sorry" and promised to turn down the dials. Yes, possibly in terms of percentage, the number of people affected this way is small. But we're still talking about thousands of lives wrecked!
To me, any person capable of wrecking so many lives is a monster.
Yep, ive read that one just before coming across the post. That's exactly what I was referring to. Scary stuff. Worse for me, I'd be a perfect candidate to fall for it.
So much to unpick in your comment.
1. Saying something is dangerous doesn't mean I want to ban it.
2. AI encompass LOTS of different things, which have different uses and pitfalls. The AI used to analyse scans, or to create better quicker subtitles is not the same thing as a chatbot (the lie generator)
3. When it comes to Chat GPT and LLM chatbots, there zero benefit and lots of dangers. One of them is inducing people thinking they're the messiah.
@giosci
@Lily_and_frog @Gargron
Creating tools reinforces the idea that the tool's function is something worthwhile that needs to be done.
When all you have is a hammer, etc. etc.
What is the machine built to do?
@LeBonk @Lily_and_frog @Gargron
"What is the machine built to do?"
I think we both agree, the tool (machine) can be built with good intentions but may end up being used, by some, for bad purposes...
AI governance and its ethics is fundamental. Many of the AI creators are so 'excited' about the new toy that they don't seem to worry too much about the downsides... (or am I naive?)
If AI is going to shape our world in specific ways, we might need to consider what values are being built into these systems from the start, I guess.
@Gargron Lead in gasoline. CFC in hairspray.
I think there are some precedents 🤔
DDT just about everywhere, messing up hormonal balances in entire ecosystems.
We've never needed computers to do really big mistakes, even if they do make it easier.
The problem is not making mistakes, but continue making them after effects become as visible as sun in the middle of the desert.
DuPont continued using PFAS even after discovering the problems (https://time.com/6284266/pfas-forever-chemicals-manufacturers-kept-secret/). Some provinces in China was still using/producing CFC-11 in 2019 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1193-4).
Lastly, Exxon nailed how global warming would happen in 1977 (https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/01/harvard-led-analysis-finds-exxonmobil-internal-research-accurately-predicted-climate-change/)!
@s427 @sphinxc0re @Gargron I was talking in the domain of PFAS and oil.
LLMs are a special class of bad, I agree. I don't use them, don't recommend them. The tech is useful as it is, but how it's trained, implemented and pushed upon us is knowledge and user hostile at best.
Oftentimes when some dangerous thing gets invented, its inventors don't yet know it's dangerous. Like all those mildly radioactive products in the early 20th century. Or tobacco before it was found to be very bad for one's health. ChatGPT was initially just a cool tech demo.
But continuing after it was found dangerous, now that's the problem. As previous examples have shown, companies themselves will not stop because they wouldn't want to go out of business out of good conscience. The only way these sorts of thing stop is government regulation.
@Gargron I'd have gone for leaded petrol as the ideal example. It's pushed by an industry that bribes politicians and runs a PR campaign to mislead the public about both the safety and utility of the product, but really it floods the environment with a toxin that makes everyone stupid.
And we never even needed it - there were non-toxic alternatives available, they just cost more.
@Gargron I have to say that I'm more careful and read more sources than before LLMs where available. I consider this change in my personal behavior a good thing.
For me personally this technology has been extremely useful and empowering.
But I understand that the whole scope of your toot will of course affect me as well by proxy.
@cedric I have created many automation scripts to automate my workflow and file tasks, created several (simple!) games that I can now play without tracking and advertisement, created MIDI generation tools, exponentially sped up my infrastructure / hosting knowledge and implementation and probably a bunch of other things I don't remember atm.
For me personally it was great help and now I feel I can much better help other people take digital infrastructure into their own hands.
@Gargron Maybe more pre-historic than historic, but if the aim is to persuade peasants to work themselves to death and give up their food as taxes in the hope of glittering rewards in a fictional afterlife, then something of the sort might have been tried before.
Although that also relied on the unknowable workings of inscrutable abstractions of which anyone could make requests, the gnomic replies were interpretable only by an exclusive clique, which presumably made all the difference.
AI could unlock vast technological potential—if we do it right. Rob Bilott, who fought chemical giants over toxic PFAS, shares a cautionary tale: how the harms of new tech can go unchecked, and why we must align innovation with safety before it’s too late.
Examine the motives of those funding the AI & cryptocurrency hype.
They are all people looking for their next set of credulous rubes, their next grift, and especially looking for ways to increase wasteful uses of energy.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-03/opec-agrees-another-oil-supply-surge-for-june-delegates-say
It's about keeping the globe hooked on oil.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-03/saudis-double-down-on-seismic-opec-shift-to-sink-oil-prices
The fossil fuel industry is dumping billions on "plausible sentence generators" not for the product's utility, but for its capacity to...
1/3
Saudi Arabia is planning a new artificial intelligence project with backing of as much as $100 billion as it seeks to develop a technological hub to rival the neighboring United Arab Emirates, people familiar with the matter said.
2/3
... manipulate the stock market, particularly oil prices.
It's also useful for:
1. Election interference
2. Automated pandemic disinformation
3. Ubiquitous state surveillance
4. Molding public sentiment to foster fascist movements
5. Mass layoffs
6. Wage suppression
7. Union busting
8. Imposing class-based market segmentation on public services (only the rich get a real doctor or a real education)
9. Achieving reductions in trust for genuine expertise
3/3
10. Enabling collusion on price fixing & inflating housing costs
11. Theft of IP
12. Dissemination of malware & spyware
So far, the cons far outweigh the pros.
As the planet fries, an accelerated transition away from fossil fuel becomes an imperative.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/05/23/1092777/ai-is-an-energy-hog-this-is-what-it-means-for-climate-change/
Solar, wind, hydro, and other sources of renewable energy defunds the most corrupt industry on earth & might save the planet from fascism, war, famine, & ecocide.
@Gargron CFCs in fridges nearly ripped the upper atmosphere, and Tetraethyllead lead induced violence and stupidity in a generation.
I hope that the whole world getting good at detecting nonsense will be beneficial.
I looked up photos of an animal as an anatomical study/reference for drawing and there was so much AI trash in the results I couldn't always be sure what were real photos or not. I literally was not able to have any confidence that was I was studying was real or not when it came to specifics of the animals anatomy.
Really depressing cycle of bullshit information getting recycled into nonsense. AI represents a future in which learning about reality will become increasingly difficult.

Noah Smith wrote : “The combination of anonymity and virality have driven the cost of Big Lies to zero, and we’re just starting to discover what that means for human society. The tech “GPTs and other LLMs have amazing conversational ability and zero understanding of the difference between trut
If the tool requires training, even a certification, then the argument would hold. Here is a tool that requires both, yet it's been provided to everyone without any consideration. As if it was a toy.
@codinghorror @Gargron Low-background steel, also known as pre-war steel and pre-atomic steel, is any steel produced prior to the detonation of the first nuclear bombs in the 1940s and 1950s. This is a toot about LLMs
@Gargron
Have you met organized Religion?
There's this thing called "The dark ages", it lasted for *quite a while* and made life pretty miserable for everyone.
In one way or the other, religion is involved in every armed conflict currently on planet earth, except maybe the Ukraine/Russia thing.
Hey, that's not fair, teflon actually does what it's supposed to... Sure it might also cause cancer and destroy the environment, but you can't deny that it does make your pans non-stick!