I really dislike "gen" talk. The world is full of assholes and full of lovely people and full of the ignorant, and it always has been, with the categories only correlating to birth year in the minds of folks who are too bubbled-up to get out and discover strangers.

I class the vast majority of statements about gen-this and gen-that and gen-the-other down there with astrology and Kiersey-Bates.

@GeePawHill The "gen" talk is rubbish, I agree, but undoubtedly the zeitgeist in which we grew up has an impact on our worldview, hasn't it?
@booboo "We" is doing all the sleight-of-hand heavy lifting there. Do you think every person who is 65 had the same experience, even limiting it to America? Not remotely so. But gen talk suggests that it is. Trivially, race, class, gender, gender-preference, and wealth are all far more predictive factors, and even within each portion of that five-dimensional space, there are huge differences.
@GeePawHill @booboo My thoughts exactly. Not to mention how disability and health in general affects people’s life experiences as well.
@GeePawHill While I agree in principle, I do think that a certain amount of good-faith gen talk can be expected in a country where having been born in one particular half decade has been heavily correlated with access to the nuclear codes for as long as the median resident can remember...
@GeePawHill most conflicts between boomers and millenials/gen Z turn out to be conflicts between the ruling and the working class upon closer examination anyway.
@GeePawHill so much of “generational warfare” is content farming clickbait no more accurate than horoscopes