No, it doesn't reflect "uncertainly in the science world." It reflects an anti-intellectual attack on science.

@jeffjarvis

False balance and manufactured scientific controversy will kill us.

@jeffjarvis
I thought the headline meant that the "science world" has "uncertainty" about whether publishing scientific fact in the #USA is safe while #kakistocrat #convictedFelon #DonaldTrump and his sycophants are in control of the government.

Merely a poorly worded headline rather than an incorrect one.

@sloanlance @jeffjarvis Purposely poorly worded. The multiple interpretations are deliberate.

@sloanlance @jeffjarvis

Sure, but words are these people's profession, they understand what editorializing is.

@jeffjarvis You'd think smart people would've figured a way around this by now.
@jeffjarvis kind of offtopic, but I really think we should add the source of every screenshot of news we share on the Internet.
@jeffjarvis Anti-intellectualism has been a strong undercurrent in the Anglo-Saxon world for a long time
@jeffjarvis
I wouldn't teach evolution in the USA, now the official creation story is: the world was created by Donald Trump.
@jeffjarvis The press is soooo part of this problem (and i dont mean just the cargo cult journalists of Fox and friends)... We are seeing the same disease with German progressive papers, the Guardian,...
I think we should be yelling at them more because with them there is still hope to eventually fix this.
Separate headline and lead-in editors should be banned for a start.

@jeffjarvis I glanced at this and immediately thought it was a throwback headline from the 1950's or something.

What the absolute bollocks.

@jeffjarvis who tf wrote that shit headline?