While studying "Challenges and Timelines in Traditional Science Academia", I found something significant.
This table clearly shows that traditional publishing has some serious bottlenecks.
The main reason for the bottleneck is the unpaid peer review process.
It's not just one source, it's a collection. But here is the link to the doc
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10pq-bi9RUdHovtFHETPymjUSaxzVl0Gnr2iTB_s4HB0/edit?usp=drivesdk
Navigating the Labyrinth: Challenges and Timelines in Traditional Science Academia The pursuit of scientific knowledge within traditional academic structures forms the bedrock of societal progress and innovation. This system, while crucial for advancing our understanding of the world, presents a ...
Abinash Sahoo
Alexander Weber