None of that means that LibreWolf could not possibly become a viable fork that has all that.
@zacchiro This is 💯 true.
Also true is that boycotting through a switch to a TOS-free soft fork seems to be just about the only power the broad community has to push back against Mozilla's changes.
@zacchiro Correct, but in the interim they're still the only open alternative to Chromium for any sort of alternative HTML implementation. Also if Firefox stops being maintained, hopefully some of the alternative Gecko browsers will take on the task of becoming the maintainers of a Gecko fork.
Meanwhile I definitely have my eye on some of the newer implementations, especially Servo. Ladybird's also interesting although I understand their project lead has some Issues that people are wary of.
2026 though... And I'm guessing the development has been ongoing for years. Fudge... is browser development that demanding? 😖
Not that I'm complaining. Looking forward to its alpha phase... In the meantime librewolf/waterfox and zen browser is the way to go!
@zacchiro
Hello, I found that Phoenix approach with conf files to change Firefox behavior is interesting (there is arkenfox, too). It's not a fork, you do use firefox, but with better privacy settings. And you don't wait for releases.
https://codeberg.org/celenity/Phoenix
On android it's packaged as ironfox and works as well, and a «spiritual» legacy of Divested Mull browser as I understand it
https://gitlab.com/ironfox-oss/IronFox